My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-03-29_REVISION - M1982121
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1982121
>
2024-03-29_REVISION - M1982121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2024 7:50:53 PM
Creation date
3/29/2024 5:06:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982121
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/29/2024
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
RMR Aggregates, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KiLDUFF RMR Aggregates, Inc. <br /> U N D E R G R D U N D Revisions Table-Rock Failure Analyses and Stabilization Report <br /> E N G I N E E R I N G,I N C. Mid Continent Limestone Quarry <br /> 4) Within Section 8 of the Report, it is unclear to This has been clarified in what is <br /> the Division on what KUE is defining as the now section 9. <br /> in reference to KUE <br /> recommendations to remove said layer. Earlier in <br /> the Report, KUE labels the <br /> It would appear to the Division that when <br /> referring to the <br /> �Please�have <br /> KUE provide additional clarification on whether <br /> cli the recommendation is to remove just <br /> d <br /> 5A) Under Section 6 of the Report,a long-term static Table was misnumbered and has <br /> stability analysis was conducted using the been corrected to Table 6. <br /> postmining configuration of the massive <br /> o limestone layer for varying bench slope <br /> geometries. A total of three bench slope <br /> geometries were analyzed with resulting FOS as <br /> provided in Table 4 of the Report. <br /> 0 <br /> 513) However only the results from the bench slope Appendix D now includes stability <br /> geometry for 1.67:1 was provided under runs for bench geometries of 1:1, <br /> Appendix D. 1.4:1 and 1.67:1 for both static and <br /> seismic <br /> 5C) Additionally, it appears an error exists in Table 4 Appendix D is correct and the text <br /> r� for bench slope geometry of 1.67H:IV. The has been edited. <br /> resulting slope stability analysis under Appendix <br /> D shows a FOS of 1.66 while Table 4 has a FOS <br /> of 1.63. <br /> w 6A) It appears the Division that inconsistencies exist KUE has clarified throughout the <br /> with the material strength input parameters used report that the models were run <br /> within the analyses of Appendix G when using the established empirical <br /> compared to the values provided under Table 2 values for rock strength. Appendix <br /> of the Report. G values for joint strength and <br /> other joint parameters that dictate <br /> stabilization are included in <br /> Appendix G. <br /> 613) Additionally, a different failure plane angle was The slope angle has been revised in <br /> used in comparison to other analyses Appendix G from 31 to 30 degrees. <br /> provided. Parameters across the report have <br /> been corrected as necessary for <br /> consistency. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.