Laserfiche WebLink
Case 2 - The resulting safety factor of 7.51 exceeds the SEO minimum requirement of <br /> 1.30 for an embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 3.00 is above <br /> the SEO minimum requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake <br /> loading. Using a full reservoir water surface elevation in the reservoir provides greater <br /> safety factors, 15.62 under static loading and 7.39 under earthquake loads. The <br /> proposed setback of 50 feet from the right-of-way is satisfactory. <br /> Case 3 - The resulting safety factor of 6.25 exceeds the SEO minimum requirement of <br /> 1.30 for an embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 2.78 is above <br /> the SEO minimum requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake <br /> loading. Using a full reservoir water surface elevation in the reservoir provides greater <br /> safety factors, 13.11 under static loading and 7.18 under earthquake loads. The <br /> proposed setback of 150 feet from the well head is satisfactory. <br /> Case 4 - The resulting safety factor of 4.97 exceeds the SEO minimum requirement of <br /> 1.30 for an embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 2.49 is above <br /> the SEO minimum requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake <br /> loading. Using a full reservoir water surface elevation in the reservoir provides greater <br /> safety factors, 11.94 under static loading and 6.83 under earthquake loads. The <br /> proposed setback of 50 feet from the easement is satisfactory. <br /> Case 5 - The resulting safety factor of 5.19 exceeds the SEO minimum requirement of <br /> 1.30 for an embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 2.54 is above <br /> the SEO minimum requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake <br /> loading. Using a full reservoir water surface elevation in the reservoir provides greater <br /> safety factors, 13.43 under static loading and 6.78 under earthquake loads. The <br /> proposed setback of 50 feet from the right-of-way is satisfactory. <br /> Case 6 - The resulting safety factor of 6.25 exceeds the SEO minimum requirement of <br /> 1.30 for an embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 2.76 is above <br /> the SEO minimum requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake <br /> loading. Using a full reservoir water surface elevation in the reservoir provides greater <br /> safety factors, 14.51 under static loading and 7.04 under earthquake loads. The <br /> proposed setback of 50 feet from the gas line is satisfactory. <br /> Case 7 - The resulting safety factor of 8.98 exceeds the SEO minimum requirement of <br /> 1.30 for an embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 3.05 is above <br /> the SEO minimum requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake <br /> loading. Using a full reservoir water surface elevation in the reservoir provides greater <br /> safety factors, 19.24 under static loading and 5.15 under earthquake loads. The <br /> proposed setback of 50 feet from the well head is satisfactory. <br /> Lupton Meadows Sand and Gravel <br /> J&T Consultin Inc. Lupton Meadows Sand and Gravel Mine <br /> �! Slope Stability Analysis <br /> Page 6 <br />