My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-01-31_REVISION - M1977344 (33)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977344
>
2024-01-31_REVISION - M1977344 (33)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2024 8:27:19 AM
Creation date
2/6/2024 9:20:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977344
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/31/2024
Doc Name Note
App 4.11 Hydrologic Analysis
Doc Name
Adequacy Review - Preliminary
From
Holcim
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM2
Email Name
TC1
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Michael Toelle <br />Holcim US, Inc. <br />January 31, 2024 <br />Page 5 <br />Holcim RCQ Letter Report 20240131 <br />Infiltration Calculations <br />The RCQ will consist of an open-pit limestone quarry and two sandstone pits. The site is <br />comprised of Cretaceous age marine sediments of inter-bedded limestones, sand- <br />stones, and shale (Scott and Cobban 1964). During mining, four open pits will be exca- <br />vated to the Codell Sandstone layer, which slopes toward the north. At reclamation, one <br />of the pits will be partially backfilled with shale and the other three pits will have ex- <br />posed pit sidewalls and Codell Sandstone bottoms. The backfilled pit surface and the pit <br />bottoms are shown on the reclamation plan as being level surfaces that cover a rela- <br />tively large area (approximately 840 acres total). <br />As part of a multi-year baseline investigation to document and characterize the site hy- <br />drologic system, five monitor wells were installed at the RCQ in November 2021 and are <br />screened in the Codell Sandstone (BC 2023). The wells were spaced to ensure the data <br />collected from each well was spatially distributed to characterize the hydrologic proper- <br />ties of the water bearing units. Four of the wells were completed in the Codell Sandstone <br />and one well was completed in the Fort Hays Limestone. <br />The hydrologic properties of the Codell Sandstone were evaluated to assess the ground- <br />water system at the Site. Slug tests were conducted to estimate hydraulic conductivities <br />of the sandstone and limestone layers. The hydraulic conductivity for the Codell Sand- <br />stone was determined from these tests to be approximately 0.011 feet per day (ft/day; <br />BC 2023). The hydraulic properties for the Fort Hays Limestone were estimated based <br />on previous groundwater modeling efforts in the area to be 0.0054 ft/day (Resource Ge- <br />oscience, Inc. 1999). No hydraulic information currently exists for the Smokey Hill Shale <br />pit backfill material; therefore, the RCQ groundwater model used an estimated hydraulic <br />conductivity of 0.5 ft/day, which is two orders of magnitude larger than the Fort Hayes <br />Limestone. <br />For the infiltration calculations, the backfilled pit surface and the exposed pit bottoms <br />were assumed to be completely level (as shown by the lowest closed contour elevation). <br />The backfilled pit was assumed to have an infiltration rate (i.e., hydraulic conductivity) of <br />0.5 ft/day and the exposed pit bottoms were assumed to have an infiltration rate of <br />0.011 ft/day. The time required to infiltrate the runoff from a 5-year, 24-hour storm <br />event was calculated using the following equation: <br />𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒=𝐷𝑠𝑤 <br />𝐼 <br /> Where: Time = time to infiltrate (hours) <br />Dsw = depth of stormwater pool (feet) <br />I = infiltration rate (ft/hour = ft/day ÷ 24 hours/day) <br />Table 2 summarizes the stormwater runoff to each area and time required to infiltrate <br />97 percent of the stormwater volume. Because the results show that some areas of the <br />pit (i.e., Pits 3a and 3b) may fail to infiltrate 97 percent of the stormwater within 72 <br />hours, no further analysis was performed to assess the 120-hour, 99-percent require- <br />ment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.