My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-01-31_REVISION - M1977344
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977344
>
2024-01-31_REVISION - M1977344
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2024 8:21:06 AM
Creation date
2/6/2024 8:40:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977344
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/31/2024
Doc Name Note
Holcim Response to PAR 20240131
Doc Name
Adequacy Review - Preliminary
From
Holcim
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM2
Email Name
TC1
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> 5/12 <br />6.4.4 Exhibit F- Reclamation Plan Map <br /> <br />20. Exhibit F General Requirements: Rule 6.2.1(2)(e) requires an appropriate scale on the <br />map(s) be provided. As the submittal was received in electronic format, a scale bar is <br />needed. Please include a scale bar on Exhibit F. <br /> <br />Response: Exhibit F includes a scale bar in the lower left-hand corner. <br /> <br />21. Drainage Concern: Please see Comment No. 19 above. If a change in the final grading <br />plan is necessary, please provide an updated Exhibit F to reflect the change(s). <br /> <br />Response: Exhibit F is revised to reflect potential locations of the infiltration galleries. <br /> <br />22. Canyon Walls: Exhibit F shows a “thin” wall to remain between the existing Red Creek <br />canyon and the excavated quarry. Please provide rationale for the width of the material to <br />be left in place. The DRMS is also concerned about the potential impact on the <br />geotechnical stability of the wall after reclamation (see Comment No. 35 below) <br /> <br />Response: Exhibit F now includes cross-section figures showing the distance between Red Creek <br />canyon wall and the excavated quarry. The distance between Red Creek canyon walls and the <br />excavated quarry is substantial. Based on the Blasting Plan (Appendix 4.1) pre pared by Holcim <br />with data from SRK Geotechnical Services, the distance is adequate to remain stable during <br />reclamation. In addition, the cross-sections do not reflect high wall sloping that will increase <br />geotechnical stability of the “thin” wall. <br /> <br />23. Bear Creek Quarry Diversion: During our July 19, 2023, inspection, we discussed the <br />“outfall” of the Bear Creek Diversion in the approved Exhibit F-1 from AM-1 (see image <br />capture below). Please address this as part of AM-2 or provide a written commitment to <br />address this change as part of the technical revision process by May 30, 2024. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Response: The BCQ Diversion will be addressed as a Technical Revision for AM-01 prior to May <br />30, 2024. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.