My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-12-14_REVISION - M1998013
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1998013
>
2023-12-14_REVISION - M1998013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2023 8:46:36 PM
Creation date
12/14/2023 9:49:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1998013
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/14/2023
Doc Name
Request For Succession Of Operator
From
Burnco Colorado, LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SO4
Email Name
ECS
MAC
SMS
EL1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Mark Johnson <br /> January 2 , 2014 <br /> Page 5 <br /> Soil-Bentonite Slurry <br /> The proposed slurry wall will consist of a mix of the overburden clay and imported bentonite. The resulting mix will <br /> produce a non-Newtonian fluid with some shear strength characteristics based on a reduced friction angle of the <br /> overlying clay overburden. Based on engineering judgment,we modeled the slung wall as follows: <br /> Dry Unit Moist Unit Saturated <br /> Weight(pcQ Weight(pco Unit Weight Cohesion C'psf Friction Angle 0"' <br /> NA 112 115 0 0 <br /> STAB►UTYANALYSES RESULTS <br /> Stability analysis included three conditions: <br /> 1. Proposed dry mining slopes with a slung wall. <br /> 2. Seismic loads from an estimated earthquake bad with a mine full of water. <br /> 3. Rapid draw down of water levels within the mine. <br /> Setbacks listed in Table 1 indicate the minimal setback from the structure to the mining limits. The setback <br /> distance can be increased as needed to address other restrictions. <br /> The factor of safety shown below is the minimum factor of safety of the three conditions listed above. <br /> TABLE 1 •SLOPE STABILITY RESULTS AND SETBACKS <br /> Section Location Critical Structure Modeled Surcharge Slurry Wall Factor of <br /> (pso Setback ft Safety <br /> AA' West Phase 1 Ditch/House 2000 25 from Ditch 1.133(rapid <br /> drawdown <br /> BB' North Phase 1 Ditches/Road/Utilit 250 25 from Ditch 1.226 <br /> (earthquake) <br /> CC' West Phase 2 Ditches NA 25 from Ditch 1.262 <br /> (earthquake) <br /> DD' Phase 1/Phase 2 Oil Well 500 75 from Well 1.072 <br /> (earthquake) <br /> EE' South Phase 2 Ditch/Utilities 300 25 from Property 1.131 <br /> Line (earthquake) <br /> FF' South Phase 1 Farm Structures 1400 25 from Property 1.010 <br /> Line (earthquake <br /> The mining setback will be the slurry wall setback plus twelve feet. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> The minimum distances proposed in this report will likely be increased more for construction and maintenance than <br /> for stability. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.