Laserfiche WebLink
Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment <br />Twentymile Coal, LLC. / Foidel Creek Mine <br />Violation No. CV-2023-001 (Issued November 21, 2023) <br />Date of Proposed Assessment: December 13, 2023 <br /> <br />Material reviewed: Colorado Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety’s (“DRMS” or “Division”) CV-2023-002 Notice <br />of Violation (“NOV”) document, Twentymile Coal, LLC.’s (“TC”) response to NOV CV-2023-002 received on <br />December 5, 2023, DRMS file for Technical Revision No. 92 (TR92), and the Permit Application Package (“PAP”) maps <br />for the Foidel Creek Mine (Permit No. C-1982-056) approved on 2/8/2019 titled “WC 23, Wolf Creek Mine Plan <br />Modification” and “Map #23B Wolf Creek Mine Plan”. <br /> <br />Rule 5.04.5(3)(a) – History of Previous Violations <br />No notice of violations have been issued within one year of the issuance date for CV-2023-002. Therefore no penalty will <br />be assessed for this provision. <br /> Penalty assessed: $0 <br /> <br />Rule 5.04.5(3)(b) – Seriousness <br />Rule 2.04.4 requires an applicant to provide a description of the cultural and historic resources listed or eligible to be <br />listed on the National Register of Historic Places and significant known archaeological sites exiting on the date of <br />application within all areas proposed or likely to be affected by surface activities or planned or probable subsidence over <br />the life of the mine. TC did not provide the required information at the time of application when TR92 was submitted. <br />DRMS approved TR92 with the stipulation (ST67) that TC would complete a supplemental cultural resource survey for <br />the expansion of panel 7 Right LW Panel 3 (7 East Panel) to satisfy the concerns/obligations of the Office of Archaeology <br />and Historic Preservation prior to longwall mining in the affected area. Further, the survey was to be submitted to the <br />Division in the form of a Minor Revision to be incorporated into the PAP prior to longwall mining in the area in question. <br />Also, Rule 2.05.6(4) requires that any place listed on the National Register of Historic Places that may be adversely <br />affected by the proposed operation be protected by implementing a plan to minimize or prevent those impacts. Rule <br />2.05.6(4) allows the Division to require an applicant to protect historical or archeological sites listed or those places <br />eligible to be listed, as determined by the State Historic Preservation Officer (“SHPO”), on the National Register of <br />Historic Places through appropriate mitigation and treatment measures. These rules and standards were designed so <br />cultural and historic resources would first be identified and evaluated, and should any be found, appropriate protection <br />and/or mitigation measures could be planned prior to affecting the area in question. TC had two opportunities to comply <br />with these requirements, one at the time TR92 was submitted, and second prior to affecting the area in question by <br />complying with ST67. In TC’s December 5, 2023 NOV response letter, they explain the area in question in the 7E Panel <br />was primarily affected by subsurface room and pillar mining methods and only a small portion of this area was longwall <br />mined resulting in a .6 foot to 3.2 foot deviation in ground surface. Previous archeological studies cited in the Foidel <br />Creek Mine PAP page 2.04-9.3 found that limited projected changes in ground elevation from subsidence at the site <br />would likely have negligible impact on buried cultural materials. However, without knowing if any surface or subsurface <br />cultural and/or archaeological resources are located within the affected area, one can only speculate what impact <br />subsidence would have on these resources and/or if any mitigation measures would have been appropriate. <br /> <br />Given the small area in question with the NOV and the limited amount of subsidence TC reported, likely resulting in <br />minimal surface impacts, the Division finds the seriousness of the violation to be low. <br /> Penalty assessed: $250.00 <br /> <br />Rule 5.04.5(3)(c) – Fault <br />This violation was a result of negligence. TC should have conducted a cultural and historic resource survey prior to the <br />submittal of TR92. On February 15, 2019 the Division received the signed TR92 Decision Form where the authorized <br />representative of TC signed and acknowledged ST67. Further, TC failed to comply with the stipulated approval of TR92 <br />prior to affecting the area in question. <br /> Penalty assessed: $750.00 <br /> <br />Rule 5.04.5(3)(d) – Good faith in achieving compliance <br />One abatement step is required to be completed by December 21, 2023 for CV-2023-002. TC was required to complete a <br />supplemental cultural resource survey for the expansion area of panel 7 Right LW Panel 3 (7 East Panel) to satisfy the <br />concerns/obligations of the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. The survey must be submitted to the