Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kevin Rein <br />Office of the State Engineer <br />Page 3 <br /> Dust Suppression <br />Use/Consumed Sanitary Use Sanitary <br />Consumed <br />Total Water Consumed <br />from Wells <br />Dec 1.25 0.17 0.02 1.27 <br />Total 35.00 2.00 0.20 35.20 <br /> <br />Timing of Depletions <br /> <br />Based on the fact that Red Creek is a perennial stream, water consumed from use at the RCQ <br />is assumed to impact the Arkansas River through the groundwater system, rather than Red <br />Creek. These impacts are lagged over time based on the geologic characteristics of the local <br />aquifer. While the wells have not been sited at this time, the estimated parameters for the <br />Glover analysis to lag depletions are based on nearby well locations that were included in an <br />SWSP approved by DWR in 2020 (Ranch Land Development SWSP #5767, WDID 1407830) as <br />follows: <br />• Transmissivity of the aquifer = 1,347 gpd/ft <br />• Storage Coefficient = 1 X 10-4 <br />• Width of the aquifer = 95,303 ft <br />• Distance from the wells to the Arkansas River = 15,000 ft (estimated distance). <br />Using these parameters, the unit lag response for the wells is shown in Table 2. Note that the URFs <br />originally calculated in the AWAS/Glover model showed depletions impacting the river from the wells <br />over 150 months. However, at least 95% of the depletions impact was in the first 124 months. There- <br />fore, the URFs were adjusted to “wrap” the remaining depletions into these 124 months. <br />Holcim will use the URFs below to lag depletions from the wells to determine the impact to the Arkan- <br />sas River. The lagged depletions determined from the projected consumptive use of water from the <br />wells and lagged using the URFs below for calendar year 2025 is shown in Table 3. <br />