My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-06-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2023-06-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2024 9:41:43 AM
Creation date
9/27/2023 8:50:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/29/2023
Doc Name
Volume 1 Rule 4
Section_Exhibit Name
4.01 Through 4.30
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 3 PERFORMANCE BOND REQUIREMENTS <br /> <br />Rule 4 Performance Standards 4-48 Revision Date: 6/13/23 <br /> Revision No.: MR-247 <br />may be counted is dependent upon the location of its main stem or root collar where it exits the <br />ground surface with regard to belt limits. A total of 5 or 15 belt transects may be sampled for each <br />monitoring unit. <br /> <br />For bond release sampling with belts, sufficient samples must be collected to insure adequacy of <br />the effort (to facilitate valid testing) in accordance with one of the three methods under either Rule <br />4.15.11 (2), or Rule 4.15.11 (3). Depending on the selected protocol, care must be taken to collect <br />at least the minimum number of samples indicated. <br /> <br />The second method, total enumeration, may be employed for monitoring when the size of a unit is <br />less than approximately one to two acres in size. Total enumeration shall be the typical method <br />utilized for bond release purposes unless shrub patches are too large (e.g., greater than 10 to 15 <br />acres) to practically utilize this technique (in which case belts will be utilized). This method <br />involves total counts of woody plant populations as opposed to estimates of mean densities through <br />statistical sampling. Implementation of the total count technique would involve circumscribing <br />the boundaries of a target polygon with hip chain thread or similar visible designation. Once a <br />unit is circumscribed in this manner, a team of two or more biologists walking shoulder-to- <br />shoulder traverse the plot enumerating each plant by species. The person farthest inside the line <br />of observers trails hip chain thread, or other means, to mark their path to prevent missing or double <br />counting specimens on subsequent passes. The distance between observers should be 15 to 20 feet <br />or less depending on the height of grasses and the presence of low growing taxa such as rose or <br />snowberry. Each internal observer should also “zigzag” as the team progresses, occasionally <br />turning to view the area just passed to ensure visual coverage of the entire survey path. Constant <br />communication among crew members precludes double counting or missing of plants located <br />along the margins of observed paths. Results from total enumeration efforts can be compared <br />directly with success criteria without statistical testing. <br /> <br />Sample Adequacy Determination <br />Sampling within each unit under consideration for bond release shall start with a minimum of 15 <br />(reference area) or 20 samples (revegetated area) and continue until a statistically adequate sample <br />has been obtained in accordance with Rule 4.15.11 (2). Woody plant density success comparisons <br />can be obtained utilizing Rule 4.15.11(2) or Rule 4.15.11 (3). For woody plant density adequacy <br />determinations utilizing Rule 4.15.11 (2)(a), the estimate is to within 15% of the true mean. Where <br />sampling is for managerial (monitoring) information, adequacy is not necessary and is calculated <br />for informational purposes only. <br /> <br />Success Evaluation <br />To summarize, success evaluations involve either a direct or a statistical t-test comparison of <br />appropriate parameters for each variable of interest (cover, production, diversity, or woody plant <br />density). Ground cover and production comparisons shall be made against reference area data of <br />the same year. Diversity and woody plant density variables shall be compared against the <br />standards defined above. <br /> <br />For bond release efforts, direct comparisons are made when the revegetated area mean value for a <br />given variable is greater than either 90% of the standard or the reference area mean assuming that <br />a statistically adequate sample has been collected in accordance with Rule 4.15.11(2)(a). If a
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.