Laserfiche WebLink
Colony Reclamation Cost Estimate, Update to Exhibit L Rev. Sept. 2023 <br /> Format and Cost Calculation methods, which are based on Means Heavy Construction Cost <br /> Data and productivity data from the Caterpillar Performance Handbook. This provides a concise <br /> and supportable cost for mine reclamation earthwork using various equipment fleets based on <br /> the most recent Caterpillar Handbook productivity. Although this document was developed to <br /> establish a uniform pro-forma methodology to calculate reclamation bonds for large Wyoming <br /> open pit coal mines, it provides an excellent reference point for similar mining earthwork <br /> projects in the Rocky Mountain west. Further, its cost data has been updated annually for many <br /> years and incorporates the appropriate costs for related reclamation items based on current <br /> Means Cost Data. The most recent update was December 2022. <br /> While the procedures and associated costs from the Wyoming Guideline 12 are based on <br /> recognized techniques, all of the equipment ownership and operating costs provided in the <br /> December 2022 update have been reduced by 30 percent compared to the actual Means Cost <br /> Data. As stated in the text of that document, this is based on very favorable conditions, massive <br /> quantities of materials moved in Wyoming, and have been compared to actual proprietary cost <br /> information from the various large mines. This is simply not the case for this SR-02 estimate. <br /> Rather, for this analysis, with more diverse conditions, higher elevations, and more challenging <br /> conditions, it is necessary to increase all ownership and operating costs provided in the WDEQ <br /> Guideline by a factor of 1.42. Accordingly, all unit costs for earthwork for this reclamation cost <br /> estimate have been multiplied by this amount. Note this adjustment only applies to the <br /> earthwork portions of the total cost. <br /> Unit costs for materials, which in this case consist of seed and mulch materials costs, were <br /> obtained from recent quotes from a local seed provider for the seeds specified in Table E-3 of <br /> the original permit applications. Current hydro-seeding costs (excluding seed materials) were <br /> obtained from a phone conversation with a western Colorado hydroseeding contractor. Seed <br /> costs for hydro-seeding were based on the quotes described above, although using a seeding <br /> rate double the drill seeding rate, as specified in Exhibit E. <br /> An assumed revegetation failure rate and consequent re-work rate of 20% was assumed for all <br /> revegetation work. <br /> Unit costs or ready-mix concrete delivered to Colony's Mine Bench were obtained via quotes <br /> from local suppliers. Slush-grouting on riprap channel bottoms and side slopes is taken as the <br /> delivered price of the ready-mix concrete plus a pump truck if needed. Poured concrete in <br /> forms is taken as the delivered price of the ready-mix concrete plus the same amount to cover <br /> the cost of forming and pumping, including a pump truck where necessary. <br /> Indirect Costs Basis and Inflation Escalation <br /> The direct reclamation costs have been calculated as described above and summarized on <br /> Table L-2. Contingency and estimates of other indirect costs have been added to the direct <br /> costs to arrive at a total bond amount as described on Table L-1. The amounts of the indirects <br /> as a percentage of direct costs have been selected in accordance with the general guidelines <br /> currently applied in Wyoming DEQ Guideline 12 for large coal mines. The Table L-1 value also <br /> includes escalation for 5 years at an arbitrary annual inflation rate of 3% to arrive at a bond <br /> amount that is expected to be adequate for at least five years. <br /> Expected Future Technical Revision, not Considered Herein <br /> This reclamation cost estimate was prepared in accordance with the specifications contained in <br /> Exhibit E of the permit application from 1980. In a few isolated cases, techniques that were <br /> considered standard practice back then have been replaced over the years. Notably, the use of <br /> Page 5 <br />