Laserfiche WebLink
Colony Reclamation Cost Estimate, Update to Exhibit L Rev. Sept. 2023 <br /> SURETY RELEASE 02 <br /> RECLAMATION COSTS <br /> This review and revision of the reclamation costs associated with the Colony Shale Oil Project <br /> CDRMS permit M1980-047 was undertaken in response to a June 20, 2023 request by CDRMS <br /> to allow them to assess the adequacy of Colony's current reclamation bond. This document has <br /> been formatted to track with the original Exhibit L "Reclamation Costs" of the 1980 permit <br /> application. It supersedes the Surety Release 01 of 2017. <br /> In general, costs and earthwork volumes are not discussed in the text portion of this document <br /> unless necessary to make a specific point. Rather, the costs and quantities are presented in <br /> attached Tables L-1 and L-2. <br /> It has been 6 years since the above described bond reduction request was reviewed and <br /> approved. CDRMS is required to confirm from time to time that the surety is adequate. <br /> This reclamation cost update follows the same general format as SR-1 which was included in <br /> Colony's July 3, 2017 request for reduction in reclamation surety, later approved by CDRMS <br /> October 31, 2017. The unit costs have been updated, and there are a few other changes in the <br /> discussion of some of the currently remaining affected areas. For continuity, the alphanumerical <br /> designation system and the individual acreage for all of the affected area that was originally <br /> developed for the 1982 Interim Site Plan amendment has been retained for this cost estimate, <br /> as it was for the 2007 Area Reduction application and the 2017 Surety Reduction request. <br /> The 2017 request for reclamation surety reduction reduced Colony's reclamation liability from <br /> $30M to $9.5M. Two major factors went into that 2017 bond reduction, namely the update of <br /> the unit costs from 1980 to 2017, and the 2007 release from bond requirements of significant <br /> portions of the disturbed area. <br /> By way of background, from time to time since 1982 then operator ExxonMobil had developed <br /> internal cost estimates for project planning purposes that have always indicated that the existing <br /> 1982 $30M bond was more than adequate. Since self bonding was then available, and since <br /> the Colony reclamation liability did not materially affect ExxonMobil's balance sheet, reductions <br /> in bonded liability were not pursued before 2017, even though it was believed that the unit costs <br /> in the reclamation liability had substantially decreased from the 1982 hyper inflated "boom era" <br /> costs, <br /> Thus, the first major component of that 2017 reclamation liability reduction resulted from the use <br /> a more sophisticated method of estimating earthwork and other reclamation costs as compared <br /> to the hyper-inflated "boom era" costs that were used hurriedly in summer 1982 to arrive at the <br /> $30M reclamation bond. That 1982 bond was based on a June/July 1982 site inventory of all <br /> affected areas. The inventory was carried out by Exxon staff following Colony's construction <br /> interruption in May 1982. However, the unit costs used in 1982 were based on the hyper- <br /> inflated unit costs for that location at that time. Conversely, the method used in the 2017 cost <br /> estimate and this 2023 update are based on current unit costs derived from the generally <br /> accepted Means Heavy Construction Cost Data, Building Construction Cost Data, Caterpillar <br /> Performance Handbook information, quotes from local vendors, and other relevant cost <br /> information. <br /> Page 1 <br />