My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-08-31_ENFORCEMENT - M1982121
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1982121
>
2023-08-31_ENFORCEMENT - M1982121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2023 1:32:44 PM
Creation date
9/18/2023 11:54:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982121
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
8/31/2023
Doc Name
Rock Failure Analysis and Stability Report
From
RMR Aggregates, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
ACY
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
K1L D UFF RMR Aggregates, Inc. <br /> J N ❑ E R G R O U N ❑ Rock Failure Analyses and Stabilization Report <br /> NGIN E E R I N G,INC. Mid Continent Limestone Ouarry <br /> KUE April 2023 field reconnaissance on the East face that indicate a tighter cluster of dip ranging from <br /> 29 to 32 degrees, all dipping to the south-southwest (192' +/-10).The steeper CGS measurement of <br /> 44 degrees is assumed to be lower on the face where the fold is steeper. The primary discontinuities <br /> controlling rock mass stability in the slope are generally persistent and control rock mass response. <br /> After defining the discontinuity sets, analyses for each mode of potential failure were performed. The <br /> number of the discontinuity stereonet poles that meet the kinematic criteria of lying within the <br /> critical zone for failure are represented on Table 1 as a percentage of the total number of <br /> discontinuities. <br /> Table 1. Summary Results of Kinematic <br /> Stability Analyses for East Face— Critical <br /> Failure Poles <br /> Failure Mode Critical Percentage <br /> Poles of Poles <br /> All 4 1.33% <br /> Wedge Intersections <br /> Sets Only 0 0.00% <br /> Limestone <br /> (Bedding 0 0.00% <br /> Planar Slide Only) <br /> (No Limits) Mudstone <br /> (Bedding 10 100.00% <br /> Only) <br /> Limestone <br /> Planar Slide <br /> (Bedding 0 0.00% <br /> Only) <br /> (Lateral <br /> Limits) Mudstone <br /> (Bedding 7 70.00% <br /> Only) <br /> Note: Failure mode numbers in table represent the percentage of total discontinuity <br /> poles that kinematically lie within the critical zone for failure. <br /> Based on the kinematic analyses, there is a low probability of wedge failure. The results from the <br /> wedge stability analyses indicate a very low probability of failure. <br /> The kinematic analyses corroborate field observations from the field reconnaissance that indicate the <br /> primary failure mode is planar sliding along the limestone bedding planes consisting of mudstone <br /> dipping adversely along the south-facing highwall. Wedge sliding of rock blocks occurs when the <br /> intersection line between two discontinuities plunges in the direction of the cut face at an angle <br /> steeper than the rock friction angle but less steep than the angle of the cut slopes (Wyllie and Mah, <br /> 20044), as seen in Photo 16. Critical intersections represent wedge geometries that satisfy frictional <br /> 'Wiley, D.C. and C.W. Mah,2004, Rock Slope Engineering,41h Edition,Spoon Press, New York, NY. <br /> Page 5 <br /> 535 16th STREET,SUITE 620 1 DENVER,CO 80202 1 (303)732-3692 1 WWW.KILDUFFUNDERGROUND.COM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.