Laserfiche WebLink
into another concrete-lined pond called the Mayflower Clear Pond. It is here where this water is <br /> routed into a pumping system and sent back to the Mayflower TSF pool. This system comprises <br /> the '5 Dam Seep-water Collection and Return System' EPF contained in the Climax Mine EPP <br /> (Appendix T, Section 5.3.2). <br /> • The EPF proposed in this TR will be located downgradient of the 5 Dam Seep-water Collection <br /> and Return System EPF,to serve as secondary containment for potential upsets and collection of <br /> potential impacted seepage. The purpose of the project is to protect water quality in Tenmile <br /> Creek,which begins about 0.5 miles downgradient of the project site. <br /> • The site is located about 0.5 miles upgradient of the beginning/headwaters of Tenmile Creek. <br /> Note that Tenmile Creek begins at the 'Parshall Flume', or Outfall 001A as defined in Regulation <br /> 33, 5 Code of Colorado Regulations (CCR) 1002-33. All construction work is planned to occur on <br /> previously disturbed channel and surface that was previously used for historic water treatment <br /> operations. <br /> • The General Arrangement (GA) of the site is depicted on Drawing No. 6-807-00102. Water flow <br /> direction is generally west to east and is depicted with flow direction arrows. Note that there <br /> are three 'spoil piles' depicted within the project area, but those are topography map artifacts <br /> and have been previously removed from the site. The topsoil stockpile on the GA drawing has <br /> also been relocated to a site adjacent to 5 Dam for near-term reclamation on the dam face. <br /> Contributing Drainage Modification <br /> • The 'Existing Collection Channel' depicted on Drawing No. 6-807-00102 will feed the collection <br /> pond and pump-back system EPF. A hydrologic analysis was performed (see below section)to <br /> determine how much water could potentially report to the new EPF via this channel. <br /> • To reduce the amount of unimpacted water reporting to the EPF, an evaluation was conducted <br /> to identify opportunities for diverting or otherwise modifying how natural runoff reports to the <br /> local drainage systems. Drawing No. 6-807-00107 depicts three culverts that will be plugged. <br /> These culverts, if left unplugged, would otherwise convey unimpacted runoff(from undisturbed <br /> surface) under Old Highway 91 and eventually to the 'Existing Collection Channel' shown in <br /> Drawing No. 6-807-00102. By plugging these three culverts, unimpacted runoff water will stay <br /> on the south side of Old Highway 91 in an existing road ditch and stay out of the EPF system. <br /> Culverts will be plugged with concrete and the road channel will be graded as depicted on <br /> Drawing No. 6-807-00107. <br /> Hydrologic Analysis <br /> • Design basis. The EPF system was sized to be capable of containing and pumping the runoff <br /> from a 100-year Average Recurrent Interval (ARI) storm event. A hydrologic analysis was <br /> completed to evaluate the runoff volume from the contributing basin and determine a <br /> corresponding pumping rate and detention storage capacity to contain the 100-year flow. <br /> • Inflow hydrology. A hydrologic model for the Secondary Containment Basin using U.S. Army <br /> Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center, Hydrologic Modeling Systems (HEC-HMS) <br /> software, Version 4.11 Beta 13 (USACE, 2023)was developed. General guidelines for model <br /> construction and parameter derivation are from Hydrologic Basin Response Parameter <br /> Guidelines (Sabot, 2008).The hydrologic analysis was used as a basis to size pumps to route flow <br /> from the Secondary Containment Pool (a.k.a. collection pond). <br />