My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-08-03_PERMIT FILE - M2023025 (29)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2023025
>
2023-08-03_PERMIT FILE - M2023025 (29)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2023 9:51:36 AM
Creation date
8/14/2023 9:51:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2023025
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/3/2023
Doc Name Note
Exhibit S - Slope Stability Report
Doc Name
Application
From
J & T Consulting Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
RDZ
MAC
AWA
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Mining Conditions: <br /> Case SS-1 —At a setback of 53 feet, the lowest resulting static condition safety factor of <br /> 1.92 exceeds the MLRB minimum requirement of 1.50 for an embankment adjacent to a <br /> critical structure. The lowest resulting pseudo-static condition safety factor of 1.53 <br /> exceeds the MLRB minimum requirement of 1.30 for an embankment adjacent to a critical <br /> structure subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of 53 feet from the gas <br /> line is satisfactory. <br /> Case SS-2 —At a setback of 91 feet, the lowest resulting static condition safety factor of <br /> 2.14 exceeds the MLRB minimum requirement of 1.50 for an embankment adjacent to a <br /> critical structure. The lowest resulting pseudo-static condition safety factor of 1.55 <br /> exceeds the MLRB minimum requirement of 1.30 for an embankment adjacent to a critical <br /> structure subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of 91 feet from the gas <br /> line is satisfactory. <br /> Case SS-3 —At a setback of 61 feet, the lowest resulting static condition safety factor of <br /> 1.96 exceeds the MLRB minimum requirement of 1.50 for an embankment adjacent to a <br /> critical structure. The lowest resulting pseudo-static condition safety factor of 1.52 <br /> exceeds the MLRB minimum requirement of 1.30 for an embankment adjacent to a critical <br /> structure subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of 61 feet from the gas <br /> line is satisfactory. <br /> Case SS-4 —At a setback of 46 feet, the lowest resulting static condition safety factor of <br /> 1.91 exceeds the MLRB minimum requirement of 1.50 for an embankment adjacent to a <br /> critical structure. The lowest resulting pseudo-static condition safety factor of 1.52 <br /> exceeds the MLRB minimum requirement of 1.30 for an embankment adjacent to a critical <br /> structure subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of 46 feet from the gas <br /> line and lift station is satisfactory. <br /> Case SS-5 —At a setback of 45 feet, the lowest resulting static condition safety factor of <br /> 1.89 exceeds the MLRB minimum requirement of 1.50 for an embankment adjacent to a <br /> critical structure. The lowest resulting pseudo-static condition safety factor of 1.51 <br /> exceeds the MLRB minimum requirement of 1.30 for an embankment adjacent to a critical <br /> structure subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of 45 feet from the gas <br /> line is satisfactory. <br /> IHC Scott,Inc —Bernhardt Sand and Gravel Pit <br /> J&T Consulting, Inc. age <br /> Slope Stability Analysis <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.