My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-08-03_PERMIT FILE - M2023025 (29)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2023025
>
2023-08-03_PERMIT FILE - M2023025 (29)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2023 9:51:36 AM
Creation date
8/14/2023 9:51:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2023025
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/3/2023
Doc Name Note
Exhibit S - Slope Stability Report
Doc Name
Application
From
J & T Consulting Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
RDZ
MAC
AWA
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case SS-3 — Gas Line Northeast of Pit. <br /> The mining operation is adjacent to a gas line on the northeast side of the pit. The <br /> proposed setback for mining is 61 feet from the gas line. The mining depth was assumed <br /> to be 34 feet in this area based on bore log information. <br /> Case SS-4— Gas Line East of Pit. <br /> The mining operation is adjacent to a gas line on the east side of the pit. The proposed <br /> setback for mining is 46 feet from the gas line. The mining depth was assumed to be 35 <br /> feet in this area based on bore log information. <br /> Case SS-5 — Gas Line South of Pit <br /> The mining operation is adjacent to a gas line on the south side of the pit. The proposed <br /> setback for mining is 45 feet from the irrigation ditch bank. The mining depth was assumed <br /> to be 36 feet in this area based on bore log information. <br /> The cross-sections located in Appendix B show the estimated phreatic surface associated <br /> with each case, the geometry used in the mining/reclamation, and the locations of the <br /> man-made structures adjacent to the mining slopes. <br /> METHODOLOGY <br /> The mining embankment configuration shown in the computer analysis represents the <br /> estimated conditions for this site. If mining conditions differ from the estimated conditions, <br /> the slope stability will need to be re-evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The Bishop <br /> Method was used in the computer analysis for determining safety factors. The procedure <br /> searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety <br /> factor. 20,000 separate failure surfaces were analyzed for each case. The required <br /> minimum safety factors are based on the policy of the Mined Land Reclamation Board <br /> (MLRD) for Factors of Safety for Slope Stability/ Geotechnical Analyses. <br /> All cases were analyzed using mining condition geometry to determine the factor of safety <br /> for each case with the steeper mining slopes. Case SS-5, which is the location that is <br /> closest to a critical structure (45 feet from the gas line), was analyzed to determine the <br /> minimum factor of safety for all reclaimed slopes. <br /> IHC Scott, Inc.—Bernhardt Sand and Gravel Pit <br /> J&T Consulting, Inc. Slope Stability Analysis <br /> �� Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.