My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-08-03_PERMIT FILE - M2023025 (42)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2023025
>
2023-08-03_PERMIT FILE - M2023025 (42)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2023 10:05:49 AM
Creation date
8/14/2023 9:26:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2023025
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/3/2023
Doc Name Note
Exhibit H - Wildlife Information
Doc Name
Application
From
J & T Consulting Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
RDZ
MAC
AWA
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ERC Bernhardt Site <br /> Threatened-Endangered Species and General Wildlife Screening <br /> and fly at 6 weeks.Primary threats to existence of this species are habitat loss due to intensive agriculture, <br /> habitat degradation and fragmentation due to control of burrowing mammals and predation by cats and <br /> dogs. <br /> • No Owl individuals were observed on or surrounding the survey area.The survey area is located within <br /> the overall range of the black-tailed prairie dog; however, no black-tailed prairie dog colonies are <br /> located within the survey area. Much of the land within the survey area is regularly grazed which <br /> further limits the potential use of the survey area by this species. <br /> 8.0 SUMMARY <br /> ERC has conducted this screening for federal and state listed threatened and endangered species and <br /> general wildlife for the approximately 134-acre survey area. The following provides key items identified <br /> as part of this report: <br /> 1. Two primary land use class/vegetation cover type exists within the survey area. Habitat within the <br /> survey area is characterized as the Great Plains Ruderal Grassland and Shrubland (98%)and disturbed <br /> (2%). Historic land use for agricultural practices has led to degradation of the native vegetation <br /> community. <br /> 2. Generally,there are features on the survey area and the surrounding area that provide general habitat <br /> for local songbirds, raptors, and small to mid-size mammals. However, habitat within the survey area <br /> is somewhat degraded and of lower ecological value from a wildlife perspective due to historic and <br /> current land use for agriculture,which has restricted overall growth and establishment of vegetation. <br /> The South Platte River and adjacent eastern cottonwood floodplain and woodland, provides suitable <br /> habitat for wildlife species and MBTA species. The South Platte River and associated vegetative <br /> community will not be impacted by the proposed project. <br /> 3. Non-raptor birds <br /> No non-raptor migratory bird nests were observed within the survey area. However prior to <br /> vegetation removal a nest survey should be completed to ensure that no nests have become <br /> established within the survey area and active nests, if any, are not disturbed. <br /> Non-eagle Raptors <br /> No non-eagle raptor nests were observed and no CPW mapped non-eagle raptor nest protection <br /> zones are located within the survey area (CPW 2023a). However, nest activity status can vary <br /> seasonally and from year-to-year. Future land use changes may require additional nest surveys <br /> (generally between February 1 and September 15 (CPW 2020))to determine activity status within <br /> to% mile of the survey area to ensure compliance with CPW recommendations. <br /> Eagles <br /> CPW SAM data identifies a bald eagle nest listed as"destroyed" being directly northeast of the survey <br /> area. Per CPW monitoring logs, the eagle nest has been inactive from 2019-2021, and destroyed in <br /> 2022. A field visit by ERC on January 25, 2023 confirmed the identified nest no longer exists and the <br /> nest area is no longer being utilized with no efforts by eagles to rebuild the nest.Therefore,the nest <br /> site and the survey area is not subject to any restriction per CPW protective buffer zone <br /> recommendations or USFWS Bald Eagle Protection Act. <br /> 4. No federally listed threatened and endangered species and/or habitat protected under the ESA were <br /> identified within the survey area. The survey area is not within designated critical habitat of any <br /> federally listed species. The vegetation community and features within the survey area were <br /> 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.