My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-07-14_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (16)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2023-07-14_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (16)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2023 11:27:47 AM
Creation date
8/3/2023 1:15:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/14/2023
Doc Name
Summary of Geotechnical Design andf Operational Cnsiderations for Highwall Mining-I,J,N, and L Pits
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix X
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 2, 2020 Page 2-1 <br />Agapito Associates, Inc. <br />2 PHYSICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SETTING <br /> <br /> The coal deposits at Trapper occur in Cretaceous sediments of the Upper Williams Fork <br />Formation (Norwest 2000). These sediments consist primarily of sandstone, mudstone and coal, <br />with less frequent occurrences of sandy shale and siltstone. For each HWM area, cores from holes <br />drilled to support the design effort were recovered and tested to determine physical properties for <br />input to the geotechnical design. The physical property data sets for each area are discussed in the <br />individual reports. A summary of the physical properties for the major rock types is given in <br />Table 2-1. The test type headings and abbreviations are defined as follows: <br /> <br />UCS Unconfined compressive strength <br />E Young’s modulus <br />S Slake durability (second cycle, percent [%]) <br />PLCS Axial point load compressive strength <br />PLT-D Diametral point load Is(50) index <br />Density Density (as tested) <br />Moisture Water content (by weight) <br /> <br /> <br />Table 2-1. Physical Property Summary of Major Rock Types <br />Rock Type <br />UCS <br />(psi) <br />E <br />(106 psi) <br />Slake <br />(%) <br />PLCS <br />(psi) <br />PLT-D <br /> <br />Moisture <br />(%) <br />Density <br />(pcf) <br />Carbonaceous Mudstone 1,960 0.14 29.1 1,240 n/a 13.1% 127.2 <br />Mudstone 2,640 0.52 66.3 1,610 44.3 7.7% 145.5 <br />Sandstone 3,610 1.10 67.6 3,060 106.3 7.9% 143.0 <br />Siltstone 3,910 1.49 81.4 3,180 89.8 6.2% 150.3 <br />psi = pounds per square inch; pcf = pounds per cubic foot; n/a = not available <br /> <br /> <br />The data in Table 2-1 show that the properties of the coal-bounding strata are similar, <br />though marginally weaker than those found at other surface mines of the Western United States <br />(US). <br /> <br />Slake durability tests were specified to provide a quantitative measure of floor trafficability <br />and as input to Coal Mine Roof Ratings (CMRR) (Mark, Molinda, and Barton 2002) used to <br />quantify roof stability. Table 2-2 provides the slake durability classification (resistance to <br />weathering) as proposed by Franklin and Chandra (1971). According to this classification <br />criterion, the mudstone, sandstone, and siltstone have high durability, while carbonaceous <br />mudstone, which occurs frequently in the immediate roof and floor, has low durability. In general, <br />should floor trafficability or poor roof conditions be encountered, leaving approximately 6 inches <br />in the roof and/or floor should improve the situation. <br /> <br />Historical data shows that jointing on the property is near-vertical, with two orthogonal <br />joint sets trending northwest and northeast (AAI 2004). <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.