Laserfiche WebLink
• 2.7.7.3 Mine Plan Area Drainages <br />Drainages in and adjacent to the proposed mine plan area have been evaluated for their potential as <br />alluvial valley floors (AVF's). The drainages south of the Williams Fork Mountains have not been <br />evaluated. Generally, ground water leaving the area to be affected flow north away from these <br />drainages from the Williams Fork Mountain drainage divide. Ground water flows down-dip (north) in <br />the proposed permit area toward the Yampa River. Surface disturbance draining south of the <br />Williams Fork Mountains is very limited, and would have no Impact to potential alluvial valley floors <br />(Hoffman-verbal communication). Map M51 shows the permit area with drainage divides. <br />The potential to effect these areas was addressed more thoroughly during pre-application confer- <br />ences with the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division (CMLRD) and the Office of Surface <br />Mining, Region V (OSM). Appendix H contains a report, "A Review of Potential Alluvial Valley Floors <br />• Associated with Utah International Inc.'s Trapper Mine in Northwest Colorado and Probable Impacts" <br />(McBride at al, 1980). This report was presented in April, 1980 to the CMLRD and the OSM. Con- <br />census was reached that Trapper Mine would likely have negligible impact on alluvial systems of the <br />Williams Fork and Yampa rivers. Further investigations of upland drainages-associated with the mine <br />plan area were determined to be necessary. <br />Geolonic Setting <br />The surficial geology of the Trapper Mine area is given in Figure 2.7-2. Two cross-sections have <br />been developed to show the subsurface geology in the area of the potential AVF's. Map M32 gives a <br />north-south cross-section along line 1,426,000 E, while a west-east cross-section is given in Map <br />M33 along line 414,000 N. Maps M34 and M35A shown the location of these two <br />u <br />2-534 ..... pp_-q . ---. - <br />