Laserfiche WebLink
Rifle Gravel Pit#1 July 2023 <br /> as Endangered in Colorado. Critical habitat for this species is outside of Colorado. USFWS <br /> guidance states that lone, dispersing gray wolves may be present throughout the state of <br /> Colorado. The project area is not within the occupied range of a known pack in Colorado <br /> and does not occur within potentially suitable habitat. The project would have no activities <br /> which would meaningfully impact the ability for wolves to disperse through the area and <br /> does not contain any predator control aspects. This project would have No Effect on the <br /> gray wolf or the species' ability to forage, disperse, or reproduce in the greater area. <br /> Mexican Spotted Owl—Threatened. This species occurs in closed canopy conifer forests <br /> and deeply incised canyons in desert habitats. The project area is outside of the range of <br /> this species, and there are no canyons or coniferous habitats in the project area. There is <br /> no likelihood that Mexican spotted owls forage in the project area, given a lack of suitable <br /> habitat of any type. This project would have No Effect on the Mexican spotted owl or their <br /> habitats. <br /> Yellow-billed Cuckoo -Threatened. This species occurs in dense riparian habitats with <br /> cottonwood overstories and dense shrub understories, exclusively near perennial rivers. <br /> The project area occurs at the edges of the general range of yellow-billed cuckoo but is <br /> located outside any mature riparian woodland habitats. The site is dominated by Russian <br /> olive and pasture conditions, and historical grazing pressure has reduced riparian shrub <br /> cover to minimal levels. No mature riparian woodland/shrubland habitat suitable for the <br /> species occurs on the parcel. There are no known occupied habitats in the near vicinity and <br /> no records of cuckoo occurring in the greater area. It is highly unlikely that cuckoos forage in <br /> the project area, given a lack of suitable riparian habitats. This project would have No Effect <br /> on the cuckoo or their habitats. <br /> Colorado River Fish - Endangered. The USFWS identified the bonytail chub, Colorado <br /> pikeminnow, humpback chub and the razorback sucker as potentially occurring or being <br /> affected from activities on the parcel. These species occur in lower elevation, larger rivers <br /> associated with the Colorado River watershed. The Colorado pikeminnow and razorback <br /> sucker have mapped Critical Habitat extending up the Colorado River to the Highway 13 <br /> bridge in Rifle, approximately 5 river miles downstream of the project area. Activity on the <br /> parcel would not occur in or adjacent to the Colorado River and would not discharge <br /> sediments into the river. <br /> The project would result in minor water depletions as a result of increased evaporative <br /> losses from the surface of the dredged pond as compared to current conditions. Scott is <br /> required to develop a Supplementary Water Supply Plan (SWSP), which would replace <br /> those losses with releases to the Colorado River from other water rights held by Scott. As a <br /> result of the SWSP, there would be no indirect loss in in-stream flows as a result of the <br /> project. The project would also be required to implement a stormwater management plan, in <br /> compliance with DRMS regulations as well as for Garfield County LUC standards. This <br /> would mitigate the risk of significant sedimentation impacts to these fish. <br /> As part of the referral agency process with USFWS and CPW, both agencies requested that <br /> the project be designed with no surface hydrologic connection from the pond to downstream <br /> waters and specifically the Colorado River. The request was made to mitigate the likelihood <br /> of nuisance fish species (e.g., smallmouth bass, tiger muskie) establishing in the pond and <br /> then migrating to downstream occupied habitats. A closed pond is an integral part of Scott's <br /> wet mining proposal and water management plans, and the current design complies with <br /> this request. Garfield County requested documentation of communication with the USFWS, <br /> included in Attachment C. <br /> 56 <br />