Laserfiche WebLink
I AND J PITS <br />Initial boxcuts running west to east will be opened just north of the croplines for the F and G seams in <br />I and J Pits, respectively. Pit water is expected to be encountered during the initial period of opening <br />each pit. Once the initial sections of the boxcuts are opened, pit dewatering should be minimal while <br />continuing highwall mining operations on the pit floor. The pit will be backfilled with material removed <br />from the advancement of the pit and placed behind the highwall miner as it advances in sections along <br />the highwall. The capture of surface runoff will be minimal as the pit progresses. Due to the nature of <br />the permeability of the spoils materials and the location of the pits near the croplines of the 1st, 2nd and <br />3rd White sandstones, water drawdown should be minimal in both pits during and after mining <br />operations in the area. During active mining, localized drawdowns in the 2 nd and 3rd White sandstones <br />may be large near the HWM entries due to the good connection with the F and G coal seams and may <br />also be significant in the 1st White sandstone. <br /> <br />COLT PIT <br />An initial boxcut running west to east will be opened in order to access the L and Q seams. Pit water <br />is expected during the initial period of opening the pit. The need for pit dewatering should decline <br />substantially as highwall mining operations get underway. Drawdowns are not expected to be any more <br />substantial than the minimal drawdowns experienced with historic Colt Pit mining. <br /> <br />DRAWDOWNS <br />Prediction of drawdown, which should occur based on the above estimates, would be several tens of <br />feet near the down dip edge of HWM but should not extend out to one mile from the permit boundary <br />due to the small transmissivities of these aquifers. Observed drawdowns have been less than these <br />predictions. Actual observations of drawdowns are much more indicative of impacts. These low <br />permeability aquifers have exhibited limited drawdowns in the immediate vicinity of the active pits. <br />Further, drawdowns downgradient of the active mining areas typically recover much faster than <br />expected because the increased permeability in the HWM area will readily transmit water to the <br />downgradient end of the HWM entries. <br /> <br />Drawdowns at KLM well GP-2, roughly 2200 feet distant from the G Strike pit boxcut, had developed <br />on the order of twenty feet, well within the approximate range of predicted behavior for aquifers in the <br />area, however, water levels had risen to pre-mine maximums by 2001. They have slowly declined <br />since, perhaps in response to drought or mining in the K Pit area, but not as low as the period when <br />the G Strike pit area was mined. Drawdown recorded at QR well GP-1, some 1200 feet away from the <br />boxcut, was observed at approximately 40 feet before GP-1 was disturbed by mining in early 2003. <br />Wells GC-1 and GC-2, completed in the HI and 3rd White Sandstone aquifers respectively, showed <br />slight declines in water level when A Pit mining occurred within 1,000 feet directly upgradient from the <br />wells during the early 2000’s. Water levels in these wells have since recovered to premining levels. <br />4-226e