My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-04-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (97)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2023-04-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (97)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2023 10:37:58 AM
Creation date
7/13/2023 10:15:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/19/2023
Doc Name
pages 4-1 to 4-100
Section_Exhibit Name
4.0 Protection of the Environmental & Public Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A significant difference in concentration of barium was observed in the leachate <br />from the ash compared to the ash -gypsum. This can be seen in Figure 4.3-11. The <br />high concentrations of barium (10-90 mg/1) observed.in the ash leachate were con- <br />siderably above the primary drinking water limit of 1 mg/1. <br />The concentration of barium in the ash gypsum leachate was typically below the <br />drinking -water limit of 1 mg/1. This significant reduction in barium concentra- <br />tion due to the presence of calcium sulfate in the leachate may be due to the <br />limited solubility of barium sulfate. <br />Concentrations of aluminum (30-100 mg/1) in the ash leachate were slightly higher <br />than those observed in the ash -gypsum leachate (5-20 mg/1). The high concentra- <br />tions of aluminum were more likely the result of the high pH's. <br />The leaching behavior of chromium and molybdenum for both the ash and ash -gypsum <br />columns were comparatively equal. The concentrations of chromium and molybdenum <br />were initially quite high (approximately 2-5 mg/1) then dropped off rapidly to <br />levels which approximated or were below applicable water quality limits of 0.05 <br />and 0.01 mg/1 for chromium and molybdenum, respectively. This leaching behavior <br />is graphically presented in Figure 4.3-12. <br />The concentration of vanadium leached from the ash -gypsum mixture was approxi- <br />mately 0.3 mg/1, slightly above the irrigation limit of 0.1 mg/1. The concentra- <br />tion of vanadium in the ash leachate was slightly lower than the limit (approxi- <br />mately 0.02-0.1 mg/1) as shown in Figure 4.3-13. <br />As expected, significant differences in sulfate concentration were observed <br />between the two materials as shown in Figure 4.3-13. The concentration for sul- <br />fate in the ash -gypsum mixture was equivalent to that predicted by the solubility <br />of gypsum. The small quantities of sulfate present in the ash appear to be <br />leached from the ash during the passage of the first aliquot of water. The con- <br />4-75 <br />centration for sulfate in all the ash -gypsum <br />leachates and in <br />the first <br />leachate <br />from the ash column are significantly above <br />the 250 mg/liter <br />secondary <br />drinking <br />water limit. <br />4-75 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.