My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-04-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (97)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2023-04-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (97)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2023 10:37:58 AM
Creation date
7/13/2023 10:15:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/19/2023
Doc Name
pages 4-1 to 4-100
Section_Exhibit Name
4.0 Protection of the Environmental & Public Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3) If a leachate <br />ground water? <br />occurred, is it likely to affect down -gradient users of <br />4) What criteria should be used to minimize the potential for ground water <br />contamination? <br />Potential for a Leachate to Occur <br />The recharge to aquifers at the Trapper Mine site is by direct infiltration <br />through the thin soils and by flow losses from the intermittent streams when they <br />are flowing. Most of the infiltrating recharge is from snowmelt, and the rate of <br />infiltration is probably very slow (Golder Associates, 1976). <br />The upper unit of the Williams Fork Formation receives recharge throughout its <br />area of outcrop on the crest and north slope of the Williams Fork Mountains. The <br />Twentymile Sandstone also receives recharge at its outcrop, but because the out- <br />crop width is so narrow and the slopes are so steep where the outcrops occur on <br />the south face of the mountains, this recharge contribution is probably very <br />small. Most of the mine -area recharge to the Twentymile Sandstone probably <br />occurs in the upper elevations of the mountains by downward leakage from the <br />Upper Williams Fork. However, most water within the Twentymile Sandstone in -the <br />area of the Big Bottom synclines probably moves into the area from the east, <br />rather than being derived from mine -area recharge. The Lewis Shale is also <br />recharged by infiltration at the surface, but because of its low permeability, <br />its rate of recharge is very slow. <br />Infiltration of surface waters and subsequent groundwater recharge is especially <br />significant to this study. Even if liquids are present within the disposed <br />wastes, infiltrating water is the means by which any contaminants could be dis- <br />placed or leached. The contaminants might then migrate downward from the waste <br />body, through the unsaturated zone, and into the groundwater system. The climate <br />of the study area, with low precipitation and high evaporation, suggests minimal <br />groundwater recharge. Wastes disposed of above the groundwater table may effect- <br />fvely be hydrologically isolated. <br />4-45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.