My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-04-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (97)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2023-04-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (97)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2023 10:37:58 AM
Creation date
7/13/2023 10:15:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/19/2023
Doc Name
pages 4-1 to 4-100
Section_Exhibit Name
4.0 Protection of the Environmental & Public Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.1.1 Archeological Resources <br /> <br />Of the two archeological sites (5MF288 and 5MF290, refer to Section 2.9 and Appendix K) as surveyed <br />and catalogued by Breternitz (1972), only one (5MF288) will be disturbed by mining activities. This site <br />has, in fact, been destroyed already by the construction of sediment control dams in Johnson drainage. <br />The Craig District Bureau of Land Management has approved the survey of these sites (refer to <br />Appendix K) and no further mitigation was necessary prior to disturbance. <br /> <br />The survey conducted for Trapper Mine during the summer of 1980 by Archeological Services, <br />Laramie, Wyoming, identified five sites on or adjacent to the proposed mine plan area. (Refer to Sec- <br />tion 2.9 and Appendix K.) Only three of these sites (sites 5MF945, 5MF946 and 5MF947) will be dis- <br />turbed by mining activities. None of these sites were considered worthy of testing for nomination to the <br />National Register and Archeological Services (1980) stated that no further work was needed for them. <br />Both sites 5MF946 and 5MF947 were disturbed in the spring of 1981 with topsoil salvage advance in <br />Ashmore Pit. Site 5MF945 was disturbed by mining activities during the 1993-1997 permit period. This <br />site was inventoried and recorded and no further work was proposed. (Refer to part IX of Appendix K <br />for more detail). <br /> <br />An archeological site previously identified by Breternitz in 1972 as site 5MF290 and resurveyed in 1980 <br />by Archeological Services as site 5MF949, was recommended by Archeological Services for <br />nomination to the National Register. (Refer to Section 2.9 and Appendix K for more detail.) This site is <br />outside the proposed mine plan area but inside the proposed permit area. However, the site was not <br />considered eligible to the National Register of Historic Places on August 27, 1982 by the State Historic <br />Preservation Officer (Appendix K, Part I). <br /> <br />Site 5MF948 is a pictograph on the outcrop of the Twenty Mile Sandstone on the south side of the <br />Williams Fork Mountains. This site is outside the proposed mine plan area but within the permit area. <br />The site was determined eligible to the National Register of Historic Places by the State Historic Pres- <br />ervation Officer on August 27, 1982 (Appendix K, Part I). The site lies approximately 700 feet south of <br />the closest proposed mining disturbance. Due to this distance from the mining area, the location of the <br />site on the Twenty Mile Sandstone and the relatively inaccessible location, the site will not be disturbed <br />by Trapper Mine Operations. <br /> <br />Sites 5MF9891, 5MF9892 and 5MF9894: SW of Sec. 29-T6N-R91W. These sites consist of a complex <br />of prehistoric camps. Metcalf Archaeological Consultants, Inc. recommended the sites as eligible for <br />listing on the National Register of Historic Places. These sites may be disturbed with pit advancement <br />in I Pit. The sites will be mitigated before any mining occurs in the area. <br /> <br />No other archeological sites have been recorded within or adjacent (500' or closer) to the proposed <br />mine plan area. <br /> <br /> <br />4-3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.