My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-04-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (97)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2023-04-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (97)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2023 10:37:58 AM
Creation date
7/13/2023 10:15:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/19/2023
Doc Name
pages 4-1 to 4-100
Section_Exhibit Name
4.0 Protection of the Environmental & Public Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
bility.of occurrence of percolation, the most probable percolation rate is <br />1.6 cm/year. Using the average percolation rate and available soil moisture <br />capacity, the elapsed time before percolating water will recharge ground- <br />water, is estimated to be between 500 and 1000 years. <br />(2) If water does percolate through the spoils, very little of it will contact <br />the waste as the permeability of the overburden is 10 to L00 times greater <br />than the waste. Percolating water can be expected to follow the path of <br />least resistance and will therefore tend to go around the waste body. <br />(3) The utility wastes which will be produced at the Craig Station are antici- <br />pated to be classified by EPA as nontoxic and non -hazardous. This is based <br />on the criteria given in RCRA of May 19, 1980. <br />(4) Contact of percolating water with the waste, if it should occur, will produce <br />leachate concentrations of aluminum, barium, chromium, sulfate, boron, and <br />molybdenum exceeding applicable EPA primary and proposed secondary drinking <br />water standards and NAS/NAE �rpeco�mmended limits fori�rr,igation water used con- <br />tinuously. <br />(5) Concentrations of these elements will be reduced through attenuation mechan- <br />isms by the overburden. With placement of the utility wastes in the mine <br />area in the proper ratios of waste to overburden, the attenuating capacity of <br />the overburden should be sufficient to reduce concentrations of all species <br />except sulfate to levels below drinking and irrigation water limits. <br />(6) The quality of the groundwater in the Trapper Mine can be contaminated by <br />sulfate leached from the Craig Station scrubber sludge. Sulfate will not be <br />attenuated by the overburden. However, sulfate contamination would require <br />the generation and migration of the waste leachate. <br />(7) The possibility of a hydrological connection between the Yampa River and the <br />Upper Williams Fork (the formation being mined by Trapper Mine) is very <br />remote. Piezometer studies have negated the existence of an up -section flow <br />component between the Yampa River alluvium and the Upper Williams Fork. It <br />4-25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.