My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-07-12_PERMIT FILE - M2022048 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2022048
>
2023-07-12_PERMIT FILE - M2022048 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2023 8:32:34 PM
Creation date
7/13/2023 8:23:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2022048
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/12/2023
Doc Name
Adequacy Review #2
From
Environmental, Inc
To
DRMS
Email Name
ECS
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENT, INC. PAGE 2 <br /> L.G. EVERIST, INC.-WEST FARM RESERVOIR ADEQUACY RESPONSE 02 <br /> JULY 10, 2023 <br /> pit at least up to the elevation break from the terrace bench on the west side to preserve the <br /> slurry wall during potential inflow events. <br /> If the applicant does not wish to armor, at least, the entire river facing(east)side of the Phase <br /> 1 pit, they may alternatively provide a design for reinforced inlet/outlet structures for Phase 1 <br /> designed to safely pass filling and overflow for a 100 year flood event. <br /> Please also modify the provided cost estimate as needed for any updates. <br /> We have added armoring to the east bank of Phase 1 and modified Table L-1 to included the <br /> additional length and cost. <br /> EXHIBIT F -Reclamation Plan Map(Rule 6.4.6): <br /> 21) The reclamation plan map will need to be modified as necessary... <br /> No contour elevations or interval data are provided on the reclamation plan map. Please <br /> provide elevation data for the reclamation map contours. <br /> A copy of the revised Exhibit F - Reclamation Plan Map is enclosed. The elevation numbers <br /> were added to the map and the approximate location of the under drain is shown along the SE <br /> section of Phase 1 from the toe of terrace to the east, approximately 1,880 feet.. Also added <br /> was the armoring on the east bank of Phase 1. <br /> EXHIBIT G -Water Information (Rule 6.4.7): <br /> 22) The applicant will need to provide a site characterization and groundwater monitoring plan, including <br /> at least five quarters of baseline/background water level and groundwater analytical data, sufficient to <br /> demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the "Water Quality Control Commission Regulation <br /> No. 41 - The Basic Standards for Groundwater"for the life of the proposed operation. Please note <br /> that permanent monitoring wells and Point of Compliance (POC) wells should be placed where they <br /> will not be mined through. <br /> 23) The Mining Plan as submitted only includes a 15 foot setback from the permit boundary/utility corridor <br /> to the slurry wall on the south side of Phase 1, and does not include any provisions such as a French <br /> drain, to allow groundwater to flow unimpeded around the proposed slurry wall. No groundwater <br /> modeling data has been provided to demonstrate that the construction of this slung wall will not result <br /> in excessive groundwater mounding on the adjacent property to the south of Phase 1, or adverse <br /> impacts to the irrigation return flows to the South Platte River which currently flow through Phase 1. <br /> Please provide a detailed groundwater model illustrating the projected impacts to groundwater levels <br /> adjacent to the site after installation of the proposed sluny walls. This should include a groundwater <br /> contour map showing projected depths to groundwater and any mounding or shadowing on <br /> properties adjacent to the proposed permit area. If the modeling predicts excessive groundwater <br /> mounding on adjacent property, the applicant will need to provide a plan to minimize the impacts and <br /> maintain the prevailing hydrologic balance during and after mining activity. <br /> Based on the historic data available for the site, please propose trigger levels for groundwater level <br /> mitigation and where the monitoring points will be located. For example: excessive mounding <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.