Laserfiche WebLink
There are fences within 200 feet of the Affected Lands. These fences have been added to Figure 3, <br /> Exhibit CI and Table 1.Section 4.1 has also been revised accordingly. <br /> The CDOT Structures Agreement has been updated to reflect the CDOT fencing and Westbound lanes <br /> of 1-70(Attachment B). <br /> Attachment C includes a copy of the Slope Stability Evaluation that addresses Section 6.5 Geotechnical <br /> Exhibit. The overall conclusions are that all permanent structures should not be impacted nor <br /> damaged by the proposed mining activities.All structure owners within 200 feet of the Affected lands <br /> were contacted by Scott to attempt to secure structure agreements. Only CDOT responded to the <br /> request. Therefore, the slope stability evaluation was completed in place of executed structure <br /> agreements. The slope stability evaluation covers all structures listed in Table 1,other than the CDOT <br /> structures for which Scott has an executed structure agreement. <br /> 6. Pursuant to 6.4.3(b), a portion of what appears to be the Colorado River maybe within 200 ft. <br /> of the affected lands, please indicate if this is true. If so label it accordingly on Figure 3, Exhibit <br /> C1.Similarly on Figure 3, Exhibit C1 the Colorado River Floodplain Path is included in the legend, <br /> but no actual feature is depicted on the map that correlates to the legend. <br /> The Colorado River Floodplain Path is depicted on the map by the blue line shown in the legend. The <br /> Colorado River mainstem is NOT within the 200 foot buffer of the Affected Lands. <br /> 7. Pursuant to 6.4.3(b) and (g), Based on the 200 ft. off set line of Figure 3, Exhibit C1, Interstate 70 <br /> appears to be a road/structure within 200 ft.of the affected lands. Update and label Figure 3, <br /> Exhibit C1 and Table 1 accordingly. Revise Section 4.1 accordingly. <br /> A portion of the Westbound lanes of 1-70 are within 200 feet of the Affected lands. This figure has <br /> been updated to include this structure in the legend.Section 4.1 has also been revised accordingly. <br /> 8. Exhibit C maps depict the affected land and permit boundary as the same thing in the legend. <br /> Based on descriptions in Exhibit A the permit boundary is 19.63 ac while the affected lands is 19 <br /> ac,this is a problem with regards to Rule 6.4.3(d). If these are two different acreages,the maps <br /> need to reflect that. Le. remove the outline around the wetland island and create two distinct <br /> legend features for all maps. <br /> The Exhibit C maps have been updated to reflect two distinct legend features for the Permitted Area <br /> (Permit Boundary)and the Affected Lands. <br /> 9. Figure 5 Exhibit C3—The shading of affected lands make it unclear which vegetation type <br /> correlates to the site based on the legend colors.Additionally the supporting pictures(Figures 6- <br /> 8)depict lands other than a hay/pasture. Please depict vegetation on a smaller scale map that <br /> sufficiently characterizes the site pursuant to Rule 6.4.3(e). <br /> Figure 5 Exhibit C3 has been updated with a 1 inch=200 feet scale to allow for better identification of <br /> the vegetation types. Land classifications were derived from site inspection and aerial imagery. <br /> Figures 6, 7,and 8 align with the site-specific vegetation cover. <br /> 2 <br />