My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-04-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (60)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2023-04-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (60)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2023 8:24:07 AM
Creation date
5/11/2023 8:18:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/19/2023
Doc Name
pages 2-346 to 2-424 (2-392 to 2-401 confidential)
Section_Exhibit Name
2.7 Hydrology
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
it <br />Another reason agronomic criteria are of limited value in reclamation is that the <br />majority of Trapper Mine is to be returned to rangeland and rangeland plant spe- <br />cies react in a different manner to fertilizer levels than do annual crop plants. <br />Nearly all papers on range fertilization report favorable biological results but <br />broad and often unpredictable variations (Heady 1975). Duncan and Hylton (1970), <br />based on an extensive review, described results of range fertilization which var- <br />ied because of yearly climatic variations, soil series, growth habits of the <br />plant species, stage of plant maturity at the time of sampling, plant parts sam- <br />pled, fertilizer rates and types, sampling methods and reporting units, season of <br />fertilizer application, and means by which the fertilizer was applied. An almost <br />infinite number of permutations of these causes of variation, many of which <br />remain unmeasured, complicates summarization of results from rangeland fertiliza- <br />tion. The major causes of uncertainty about responses to range fertilization <br />appear to be the variation of soil deficiencies from place to place and the fluc- <br />tuation of responses with changes in rainfall and temperatures. <br />0 Nitrate -Nitrogen (See Tables 2.7-6 and 2.7-7) <br />Nitrogen (N) expressed as nitrate -N is an indicator of immediately available <br />inorganic nitrogen for plant growth. A vast majority of nitrogen in a soil is <br />usually unavailable for plant utilization and is gradually released by minerali- <br />zation of organic matter. With the decomposition of organic matter through time <br />and weathering, plant available nitrogen is released. Spoil, however, is usually <br />devoid of organic matter except for coal or carbonaceous shales that may be mixed <br />in and the availability of the nitrogen released from this spoil organic matter <br />may not be as great as that obtained from organic material found in topsoil. <br />Therefore, plant available N is frequently deficient in mine spoils (Berg, 1974). <br />N measurements are usually not valid for coal spoils either because of the carbon <br />in the coal or carbonaceous shales usually present in spoil samples (Berg, 1974). <br />This usually produces a higher estimate of N than actually exists. Low estimates <br />however, could be relied upon as an indication of a N deficiency. <br />2-380 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.