My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-04-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (58)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2023-04-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (58)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2023 7:43:46 AM
Creation date
5/11/2023 7:41:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/19/2023
Doc Name
pages 2-263 to 2-345
Section_Exhibit Name
2.6 Soils Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
` ~ Doc 1tD ea ea ?J1„zoa, III IIIIIIi111111111 <br />999 <br />~, <br />~~~ <br />2.6.1.3 Present and Potential Productivity of Existing Soils <br />Potential soil productivity can also be inferred from a U.S. Soil Conservation <br />Service (SCS) soil and range and condition survey made Eor Utah in 1974. While <br />the mapping uniCS from that survey have since been found to be erroneous, the <br />ranges of productivity potentials that [he SCS reported are useful. This survey <br />reported on three separate range sites versus [he two general vegetation communi- <br />ties of sage-grass and mountain shrub. These range sites were listed as 1) deep <br />loam, 2) brushy loam; and, 3) clayey foothills. The deep loam range site roughly <br />corresponded with the sage-grass plant community while the brushy loam range site <br />was analagous to the mountain shrub plant community. More detailed analyses of j <br />[he clayey foothills range site during [he 1978, 1979 and 1980 vegetation moni- <br />[oring, reveal that [he areas thought to represent [his site are in fact arti- <br />facts of past surface management practices, e.g. farming, burning, root plowing, <br />spraying 2-4-D, etc. The vegetation on them is not climax and the areas should <br />not be described as having a different potential [h an the surrounding or adjacent <br />plan[ communities since they were originally corresponded [o the deep loam range <br />site vegetation type i.e. big sagebrush-grass. The tfiree SCS range sites for the <br />proposed permit area are described in the remainder of [his section. It should <br />be kept in mind that the descriptions provided by the SCS are for a typical <br />representative of these range sites as they occur regionally. <br />Deep Loam Range Si[e <br />Native (Potential) Ve ee[ation <br />This is a productive grassland community occuring in the upper foothills and <br />lower oakbrush climatic zone. Important grasses are bluebunch wheatgrass, <br />mu[[ongrass, slender wheatgrass, needle-and-threadgrass, and western whea[- <br />grass. Principal shrubs include big sagebrush, serviceberry, and snowberry. <br />Other plants include Indian paintbrush, Fremont penstemon, lupine, low lark- <br />spur, arrowleaf balsamroot, Fleabane, long-leaf loco, and tapertip hawks- <br />beard. See Table 2.6-3 for percentage composition by weight of [he princi- <br />pal species. <br />2-330 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.