Laserfiche WebLink
CCCf____7_)D <br /> CIVIL RES'DURCES <br /> in June of each year, and commit to submitting information in the annual report. This section was added to the <br /> "Groundwater Monitoring Plan"document and submitted with the Adequacy Review Response 3 letter dated June 23, <br /> 2021. In this letter,CR indicated that the Groundwater Quality Monitoring Plan section had been added for review even <br /> though the operator believes that there is no reasonable expectation that adverse impacts to water quality will occur due <br /> to the planned operation. Amendment 1 was approved on June 28, 2021. <br /> Regulation 41 and DRMS Technical Guidance Implementation <br /> CR performed a review of the DRMS permits approved since the Division's Groundwater Monitoring and Protection <br /> Technical Bulletin was implemented in November 2019. The review consisted of screening active 112C mine sites in <br /> Larimer, Weld, Boulder, and Adams counties by approval dates after November 2019. Seventeen (17) sites were <br /> determined to have been permitted and active since November 2019. Of these seventeen sites, only seven (7) <br /> encountered groundwater and had either slurry wall lined cells or were dry mined utilizing dewatering trenches. Only one <br /> of these sites (M-2020-007) required analytical testing as a permit condition and only baseline sampling of the <br /> neighboring wells. The remaining six (6) sites (M-2018-060, M-2019-025, M-2020-058, M-2019-028, M-2018-039, M- <br /> 2022-009) required monthly groundwater elevation monitoring but no analytical testing. <br /> There are four (4) permitted construction materials (112c) mines within one (1) mile of the site. Reviewing documents <br /> from the DRMS laserfische website, none of these sites have a requirement for groundwater quality testing or analysis <br /> even though being permitted while Regulation 41 was in place. All of these mines (M-2015-033, M-1999-006, M-2009- <br /> 018,and M-1996-052)are unlined or partially lined pits with exposed groundwater. <br /> The majority of the Nix Mine will be soil-bentonite slurry wall lined prior to exposing groundwater. The addition of the <br /> slurry wall lined cells will isolate the pit and working face from the hydrologic system. As the pit is dewatered any <br /> leakage through the slurry wall or bedrock will be into the pit. The trapped groundwater in the pit will be pumped to the <br /> permitted discharge point to surface waters, which is regulated under the Colorado Department of Public Health and <br /> Environment CDPS General Permit and under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. <br /> As noted in the March 31, 2023 DiNatale letter, with the slurry walls in place and the site operating under CDPHE <br /> Discharge Permit and a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure plan (SPCC) among other factors, it is unlikely <br /> that the site will be a source of contamination to the groundwater table. <br /> Responses to TR-02 Adequacy 1 <br /> With that background in place, CR has the following responses to the Division's points laid out in their March 10, 2023 <br /> TR-2 Adequacy letter: <br /> 1. No slurry walls have been constructed at the site as of yet. Construction for the north slurry wall is slated to <br /> begin summer of this year(2023). <br /> 2. As noted above, RMCC chose to include the Groundwater Quality Monitoring Plan in the overall Groundwater <br /> Monitoring Plan as part of the Adequacy Review Process and the application was subsequently approved. It is <br /> unclear which federal laws the Division is referring to in their comment as sand and gravel mining is considered <br /> "high-volume, low-hazard" and is thus exempt from regulation under the Resource Conservation and Recovery <br /> Act (RCRA) and has a SPCC for compliance under the Clean Water Act (CWA). In Adequacy Response 3, <br /> RMCC did commit to submitting the baseline data with a Technical Revision. RMCC did not commit to <br /> submitting an additional Sampling and Analysis Plan as this was submitted with Adequacy Response 3 as was <br /> indicated in the response letter, It was assumed that this plan was approved along with the Application in June <br /> 2021. <br />