Laserfiche WebLink
Nix Site Groundwater Contamination Potential <br /> March 31, 2023 <br /> implementation of water quality standards established by the WQCC. The 2022 annual <br /> report submitted by DRMS notes that, "As of this reporting period, the Minerals Program <br /> requires approximately 31 mine sites to conduct some type ofgroundwater quality <br /> monitoring. Of these sites,26 are hard rock mining operations, and 5 are construction <br /> material extraction operations."Considering that hard rock mining operations have <br /> substantially greater potential to impact water quality, particularly with respect to water <br /> quality constituents that have more severe health concerns, it makes sense that DRMS has <br /> focused these monitoring requirements on hard rock mines. Of the five construction <br /> materials sites listed in the report, four sites involved extraction of limestone for cement <br /> production and only one site (permit no. M2017-036) involved sand and gravel extraction. <br /> It is important to note that the M2017-036 site is directly adjacent to denser residential, <br /> commercial, and industrial areas than the Nix Site and is also not directly adjacent to <br /> several other aggregate mine sites that are not subject to the same monitoring <br /> requirement. <br /> 3. GROUNDWATER FLOW AND CONTAMINATION POTENTIAL <br /> Cell 1A will be unlined and used to supply water to the concrete plant to be located in the <br /> area of Cell 6. Cells 2-6 will be surrounded by low permeability slurry walls prior to mining <br /> operations in those cells. The slurry walls will be keyed into the underlying low <br /> permeability bedrock to effectively hydrologically isolate the area from the surrounding <br /> groundwater. By virtue of the slurry walls and low permeability bedrock,the potential for <br /> groundwater contamination by operations in these areas is minute. This means that any <br /> significant potential for contamination to the groundwater system would be based on the <br /> potential for contamination at the unlined ponds in Cell 1. <br /> Based on RMCC's monitoring data collected from eight monitoring wells (Figure 3) near <br /> the permit boundaries,the direction of groundwater flow in the area is generally to the <br /> west-northwest with an average groundwater gradient across the site of approximately <br /> 0.004 to 0.005. Using a hydraulic gradient of 0.0045 and a hydraulic conductivity of 350 <br /> ft/day based on aquifer data in the Colorado Division of Water Resources Decision Support <br /> System (CDSS),the groundwater flux through the permit boundary is about 325,000 <br /> ft3/day,which would act in-part to dilute any diffuse discharges of pollutants that could <br /> occur at the site. It should be noted that water levels in monitoring wells near the western <br /> and southern edges of the permit boundary are likely significantly affected by dewatering <br /> and/or cell lining occurring at the neighboring sites (DRMS Permit Nos. M 1999-006 and <br /> M2015-033). Dewatering operations will make the water levels lower than the typical <br /> static water level absent the dewatering,while lining can tend to make water levels higher <br /> on the upgradient side of the liner. It seems apparent from data from Well MW5 that the <br /> depression in the water table from dewatering at the M2015-033 site coupled with the clay <br /> DINATALE WATER CONSULTANTS 4 <br />