Laserfiche WebLink
3. The Division received timely objections from Leonard K.Vargas, Aquatic and <br /> Wetland Company, William Gee,Will and Linda Piper,Robert E &Lavenia <br /> Temmer,Todd and Audrey Schroeder, Robert L. and Mary Ellen Stamm, and Neil <br /> and Laura Coyle. <br /> 4. The Board has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this case <br /> pursuant to C.R.S. § 34-32.5-114. <br /> 5. The Board appointed a prehearing conference officer who conducted a prehearing <br /> conference on June 20,2003 in Denver,Colorado, and prepared a proposed <br /> prehearing order. Parties who appeared at the prehearing conference included the <br /> Applicant, and Objectors Aquatic and Wetland Company, Robert and Lavenia <br /> Temmer, and Neil and Laura Coyle. All other objectors failed to appear,and thereby <br /> lost their party status in accordance with Construction Materials Rule 2.7.3(4). <br /> 6. At the commencement of the hearing, Aquatic and Wetland Company announced that <br /> it has settled its dispute with the Applicant and withdraws as an objector in this <br /> matter. <br /> 7. The Board adopted the proposed prehearing order with modifications to reflect the <br /> withdrawal of Aquatic and Wetlands Company. <br /> S. The Division recommends approval of this application with two stipulations,set forth <br /> below. <br /> 9. The issues set forth in the prehearing order are: <br /> A) Has the Applicant proposed measures to minimize impacts to the <br /> hydrologic balance in the aquifer beneath the proposed mine site to protect <br /> surface vegetation, including nursery stock and wetlands? <br /> B) Has the Applicant complied with the State Engineer's rules governing <br /> injuries to water rights? <br /> C) Has the Applicant planned to minimize impact to surface water systems <br /> within and adjacent to the proposed permit area? <br /> 2 <br />