My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-03-13_REVISION - M1977211
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977211
>
2023-03-13_REVISION - M1977211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2023 8:42:28 PM
Creation date
3/14/2023 8:58:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977211
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/13/2023
Doc Name
Request For Succession Of Operator
From
Riverbend Industries Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SO2
Email Name
TC1
MAC
SMS
AWA
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT <br /> 2001 PIKEVIEW QUARRY RECLAMATIONPROJECT <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, DECISION NOTICE, AND <br /> FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT <br /> Background <br /> The Pikeview Quarry is a large pit visible from I-25 and much of the northern Colorado Springs vicinity. <br /> Specifically,it is located approximately 5 miles northwest of Colorado Springs at the southern edge of the <br /> United States Air Force Academy(see Figure 1.1). The quarry was first mined in the early 1900s for <br /> limestone aggregate and mining continued under the current owner, Riverbend Industries Inc.(Castle <br /> Aggregates), for limestone aggregate from 1970 until operations ceased in 2008. Castle Aggregates <br /> currently has a Construction Material(112)Reclamation Permit with the State of Colorado, which covers an <br /> area of 240 permitted acres for reclamation purposes, including up to 26 acres on National Forest System <br /> (NFS) lands. The quarry produced limestone aggregate until 2008 when a landslide occurred within the <br /> quarry on private lands and shut down all mining-related operations. No mining—related operations have <br /> occurred since 2008. <br /> In 2001,the Forest Service approved a Special Use Permit for an enhanced reclamation project, which also <br /> included an approved operating plan and a contract for the sale of 200,000 yd3 of material from NFS lands <br /> bounding the Pikeview Quarry. The intent of the contract was to use the requested NFS material as part of <br /> the larger reclamation of the quarry on the adjacent private lands. The operator has not exploited material <br /> from the Pikeview Quarry since 2001 and 197,500 yd3 remain on the original contract for disposal. <br /> Proposed Action <br /> Castle Aggregates proposes to utilize the remaining volume of fill material (197,500 bank yd3)approved in <br /> 2001 from the South Placer claim zone(Figure 1.2)as backfill in the earthen buttress to the existing <br /> landslide on adjacent private land. The material is primarily placed as compacted fill in a bottom-up <br /> manner and fill from the upper portions of the quarry will be dozed into place before being covered with <br /> compacted fill. Following grading of the backfill slope,the site will be revegetated by placing on-site <br /> topsoil,seeding,and planting trees(see Reclamation Plan). The post-mining use of NFS lands will comply <br /> with the Forest Plan as wildlife habitat,and all areas of the quarry will be reclaimed. <br /> Previous NEPA <br /> The range of alternatives analyzed in the 2001 Pikeview Quarry Environmental Assessment(EA)are <br /> summarized on the following page.The criteria selected by the Forest Service for evaluation of alternatives <br /> were based primarily upon environmental and feasibility factors. In particular,alternatives with reduced <br /> environmental impacts and with a higher success of reclamation potential were favored. Other <br /> considerations included the potential for mitigating the visual impacts of the previously mined area and the <br /> measurable long-term benefits. <br /> In the 2001 Pikeview Quarry EA,the selected alternative allowed the applicant to expand the quarry to <br /> occupy up to 26 acres of NFS lands in order to lay back the top cut and implement enhanced reclamation. <br /> The proposed layback operation(also referred to as west reclamation)did not occur previously due to a <br /> series of landslides that shut down quarry operations in 2008 and again in 2012. <br /> Summary of Alternatives <br /> Pikeview Quarry SIR Pa ; e 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.