Laserfiche WebLink
46. Section 2.7.5.2d refers to the GLUX-1 well as a source of baseline water quality data <br /> for the First White Sandstone. <br /> Please update Map 52 with the location of the GLUX-1 well. <br /> Rule 2.05.6(3)Protection of hydrological balance <br /> DRMS 28 February 2923 <br /> 47. Several qualitative statements are made about the movement of groundwater in proposed <br /> Sections 2.7.5.2d and 2.7.5.3d (pages 2-520yy to 2-520zz and page 2-523aa). Estimates of <br /> aquifer properties will allow the Division to better assess these statements. <br /> Please update Table 2.7-21b (page 2-462f)with data that has been collected since 2000.Please <br /> also add a column for aquifer thickness to the table. <br /> 48. Proposed Map 31 shows the locations of neighboring wells completed in the First, Second <br /> and Third White Sandstone aquifers, within one mile of the I and J Pits. Proposed Section <br /> 2.7.5.4b (page 2-524i) discusses potential impacts to these wells. LUX Well No 1,W 1406- <br /> 78 is shown on the map. <br /> Is LUX Well No 1,W1406-78 the same well as GLUX-1? <br /> 49. The second paragraph of proposed Section 2.7.5.4b states that LUX Well No 1,W 1406-78 <br /> may be impacted by upgradient mining, but the location of LUX Well No 1,W 1406-78 <br /> appears to be inside the boundary of the proposed I Pit West which suggests that it will be <br /> destroyed by mining. <br /> Please clarify the predicted impacts to LUX Well No 1,W1406-78. <br /> 50. The third paragraph of proposed Section 2.7.5.4b states that: <br /> ...wells 151991 and 93848 exist greater than one mile west of the western planned <br /> edge of the J West Pit I HUM <br /> Comparing Maps 4 and 31, the wells appear to be significantly closer than one mile to the <br /> proposed I Pit West. <br /> Please revise the third paragraph of proposed Section 2.7.5.4b to predict the impacts of the <br /> mine plan proposed with PR-11 to wells 151991 and 93848. <br /> 51. [This item is included as a placeholder—further adequacy questions related to the protection <br /> of the hydrologic balance are expected to come up following Trapper's response to this <br /> review]. <br /> Rule 4.05.13 Surface and Ground Water Monitoring <br /> DRMS 28 February 2023 <br /> 52. In the 2021 AHR, in the introduction,it is reported that: <br /> 20 <br /> Trapper Mine PR11 ADQ No 2 <br /> 2023 February <br />