My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-02-17_HYDROLOGY - M2007044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2007044
>
2023-02-17_HYDROLOGY - M2007044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2023 8:36:56 PM
Creation date
2/21/2023 8:39:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2007044
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
2/17/2023
Doc Name
Water Monitoring - Groundwater
From
Energy Fuels Resources Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
ACY
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Whirlwind Mine Groundwater Characterization Report <br /> deviates slightly and is a sodium-bicarbonate-sulfate water type. Whirlwind Decline water also <br /> exhibits a strong sodium-bicarbonate water type signature. Whirlwind Decline, the Rajah 49 <br /> Mine, and to some degree the Packrat Mine water, exhibit the same water type as Brushy Basin <br /> source waters. This fact implies that perceived Salt Wash source water chemistry is chemically <br /> similar to Brushy Basin because, 1) overall rock chemistry of the two units is similar; or 2) <br /> groundwater flow paths into Salt Wash source areas (mine workings) have been altered by <br /> exploration and mining-related activities, e.g., drill hole leakage. <br /> It is reasonable to assign Whirlwind Decline water as Brushy Basin since it is known that a main <br /> water source to the decline is from a lower sandstone zone within the Brushy Basin. A piper plot <br /> of all acquired data for the Whirlwind Decline is shown in Figure 11. Two samples collected by <br /> EFR in 2007 indicate that they were collected directly from the Brushy Basin source point in the <br /> decline. Figure 11 identifies these samples as Whirlwind Seep, and "Upper'Whirlwind Sump. <br /> These samples do not differ markedly from other Whirlwind Decline mine water samples, <br /> including those labeled "sump". All but two of the decline samples form a tight group on the plot <br /> that closely match the "Brushy Basin" sodium-bicarbonate type water. The samples collected on <br /> March 10th and June 19th, 2008, are outliers and their diverse chemistry may be related to <br /> activity in the mine, the specific sample location, or sampling method. <br /> Water chemistry of the Packrat Mine and Rajah 49 Mine may be influenced by inflows to the <br /> mine from drill hole intercepts or natural flow paths to the mine, including fractures, both of <br /> which may, originate from or come in contact with the Brushy Basin. <br /> 6.2.3.1 PR Spring and Packrat Mine <br /> The origin of PR Spring is uncertain, but it is very likely the spring is fracture-controlled. This <br /> may be related to the Lumsden Fault which lies a short distance to the north. The geologic <br /> setting and water chemistry data suggest that the spring water either contacts the mineralized <br /> zone of the Salt Wash or less common mineralized zones within the Brushy Basin. <br /> The common ion water chemistry of Packrat Mine water is similar to Brushy Basin water. <br /> Whereas PR Spring water has proportionally less sodium and slightly less chloride—enough to <br /> set it apart from the Packrat Mine and other Brushy Basin sources on Figure 8. Groundwater in <br /> Western Water S Land, Inc. 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.