Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Brennan Middleton <br /> September 30,2022 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Bedrock <br /> Bedrock below the alluvium is claystone. Claystone is generally a weak bedrock. For the claystone bedrock,two <br /> potential strength conditions were considered. These strength conditions are referred to as: 1)peak strength,and 2) <br /> residual strength. <br /> Peak strength is the maximum shear strength the claystone bedrock exhibits. The shear strength is made up of both <br /> cohesion (diagenetic bonding)and internal friction. Under short-term conditions for unsheared claystone,peak strength <br /> governs behavior. If a sheared surface or sheared zone is present within claystone because of faulting,slippage <br /> between beds due to folding,past shrink-swell behavior,stress relief,weathering,or from a landslide,the cohesion along <br /> the sheared surface is reduced to zero,and the angle of internal friction is decreased,due to alignment of clay minerals <br /> parallel to the shear plane. Under these conditions a claystone exhibits its lowest strength known as residual strength. <br /> Residual strength bedrock occurs in discrete zones, parallel with the sheared surface or zone,whereas fully softened <br /> strength occurs over a broader area(not used in this modeling). Based on data from site investigations,the residual <br /> strength claystone was modeled in a 1-foot thick,weathered layer overlying the peak strength bedrock as follows: <br /> Unit Weight Cohesion Cpsf Friction Angle 0'° <br /> (pc� <br /> Peak= 115 Peak= 100 Peak=24 <br /> Residual= 110 Residual=0 Residual= 17 <br /> Soil-Bentonite Slurry Wall <br /> The proposed slung wall will consist of a mix of the overburden, alluvial sand, and imported bentonite. The resulting mix <br /> will produce a non-Newtonian fluid with some shear strength characteristics based on a reduced friction angle of the <br /> overlying overburden. Based on engineering judgment,we modeled the slurry wall as follows: <br /> Unit Weight Friction Angle 0'° <br /> *0 Cohesion C psf g <br /> 105 0 0 <br /> STABILITY ANALYSES RESULTS <br /> The stability analyses assumed the mining will be per the previously mined slope. The plan includes dry mining in the <br /> cells as the water level in the cell is controlled by the slung wall. Mine slopes within the slurry wall lined cell will not <br /> exceed 3h:1 v. <br /> Setbacks listed in Table 1 (below)indicate the setback from the structure to the existing mine slopes. <br /> The factor of safety shown below is the minimum factor of safety of the three conditions listed above. <br /> TABLE 1 -SLOPE STABILITY RESULTS AND SETBACKS <br /> Location Critical Structure Static Factor Seismic Factor of DRMS Draft FOS <br /> (height(ft), Structure Setback From of Safety at Safety at Structure Requirement <br /> sloe) Mine Limit ft Structure (0.09g horizontal Static/Quake <br /> South(22', Underdrain 30 2.44 1.72 1.511.3 <br /> 3h:1 v <br /> Southeast(28', Concrete 39 2.89 2.10 1.511.3 <br /> 3h:1v) Ditch <br />