Laserfiche WebLink
.. 2.R SE�+ <br /> T 5 H- fib N, <br /> 6UN0'1!4 REAR,WRH� <br /> r- s -- -- 54TFI ST&EE I 57 <br /> �w'PRfSCR�RA%IF,.ROWJI - t. � SiUv3E P' 1 1 <br /> 2O'EASEMENT <br /> -- -Pr , / REC.�NOO.37428�., <br /> ERUNE Of (E% 45) <br /> THE EVANS'tATCI, , !` <br /> f / <br /> 1" REC.NO,1 969R � <br /> - (hxcERnaN 1C <br /> APRO%IWTE FLOODPU <br /> `l T <br /> F f39HNMRY( 'J <br /> SEE NOTE 6) 33-1 <br /> law <br /> e <br /> 30 EASEMENT <br /> REC.N0.2410746 -.\ l.�cl 1 i S <br /> Division Second Adequacy Comment <br /> No additional response is required from RM. <br /> 13) For the sake of clarity, the Division recommends that the entire permit area be <br /> permitted to be affected, and this should be stated in Exhibit C and Exhibit D. (The <br /> Division recognizes that this statement is made in Exhibit U <br /> Raptor Materials First Adequacy Response <br /> Your language is accurate, for it provides more precisely that all lands within the <br /> permit boundary may become `affected lands.' Regardless, this statement is <br /> included in the Original Submittal — Exhibit D, Pages 5 and 8: <br /> 131Page <br /> Correspondence to the Colorado Office of Mined Land Reclamation —Reply to Rob Zuber,EPS—Adequacy Letters of 24 June and 5 <br /> August 2022;in the matter of the Two Rivers Sand,Gravel and Reservoir Project—M2022-013. <br />