Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 <br /> Juniper Mountain House Site Development Plan—POST-SUFFICIENCY REVIEW SUBMITTAL <br /> 22. 6.4.12 Exhibit L—Reclamation Costs: The Division reviewed and will accept the Applicant's <br /> reclamation cost estimate in the amount of$241,604.00 <br /> Response: Noted. <br /> 23. 6.4.13 Exhibit M — Other Permit and Licenses: Please commit to providing copies of all <br /> required and approved permits and licenses to the Division, when available. <br /> Response: Noted. Copies will be provided when available. <br /> 24. 6.4.16 Exhibit P — Municipalities Within Two Miles: The applicant listed the Town of <br /> Gilcrest as the only municipality located within two miles of the proposed mine site. Please <br /> review and verify no additional municipalities are located within two miles of the proposed <br /> mine site. <br /> Response: No other municipalities besides Gilcrest were identified as being within two miles. <br /> 25. 6.4.18 Exhibit F — Reclamation Plan Map: The Exhibit F map provided by the Applicant is <br /> difficult to read. Please submit a large format (24"x36") copy of the map. <br /> Response: A 24"x36"is provided with this submittal. A digital copy can also be provided. <br /> 26. 6.4.19 Exhibit S — Permanent Man-made Structures: Please provide the division with <br /> copies of all signed structure agreements with the owners of permanent man-made structures <br /> within 200 feet of the proposed affected area boundary. <br /> Response: All structure owners were mailed a certified letter in October notifying them of the <br /> project. No owners reached out with concerns. After receiving the adequacy review letter all <br /> structures owners were called to discuss structures agreements. A full list of correspondence <br /> is attached to the exhibit. <br /> 27. 6.4.19 Exhibit S — Permanent Man-made Structures: Please provide a copy of the generic <br /> structure agreement sent by the applicant to the structure owners within 200 feet of the <br /> proposed affected area boundary for Division review. <br /> Response.All structure owners were mailed a certified letter in October notifying them of the <br /> project. No owners reached out with concerns. After receiving the adequacy review letter all <br /> structures owners were called to discuss structures agreements. A full list of correspondence <br /> is attached to the exhibit. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Will Charles <br /> Principal Planner <br /> CC: Craig Rasmuson <br />