My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-01-09_REVISION - M2021052 (29)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2021052
>
2023-01-09_REVISION - M2021052 (29)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 9:05:35 PM
Creation date
1/11/2023 2:43:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2021052
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/9/2023
Doc Name Note
Attachment F - Garfield County Land Use Permit Application
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
IHC Scott
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
CCW
ACY
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
;I V S, -,t` Ririe Pit #1 i�, a 2fT22 <br /> The project would result in minor water depletions because of increased evaporative losses <br /> from the surface of the dredged pond as compared to current conditions. Scott is required to <br /> develop a Supplementary Water Supply Plan (SWSP), which would replace those losses with <br /> releases to the Colorado River from other water rights held by Scott. As a result of the SWSP, <br /> there would be no indirect loss in in-stream flows because of the project. The project would <br /> also be required to implement a stormwater management plan, in compliance with DRMS <br /> regulations as well as for Garfield County LUC standards. This would mitigate the risk of <br /> significant sedimentation impacts to these fish. <br /> Due to the requirement to provide supplementary water to offset evaporative losses, as well <br /> as implementation of stormwater controls, it is anticipated that the project would result in no <br /> measurable or meaningful impact to occupied habitats downstream and would not measurably <br /> or meaningfully impact the listed fish. Given these factors, activities on the parcel would have <br /> no effect for the listed Colorado River endangered fish species and their Critical Habitats. <br /> Monarch butterfly — Candidate. Candidate species are not afforded full protection under <br /> the ESA; however, the USFWS encourages their consideration in environmental planning, <br /> and the USFWS regulatory guidance indicates that Candidate species should be treated <br /> similarly to Proposed Species regarding inter-agency consultation requirements. Informal <br /> consultation is requested when a provisional "is likely to jeopardize" determination is reached <br /> for a Candidate species (USFWS Sec7 Consultation Handbook, 1998). <br /> Monarch butterfly adults feed (gather nectar) from a variety of flowering plant species. <br /> However, the monarch butterfly only lays eggs and larvae only feed on milkweeds (Asclepias <br /> spp.). The western population overwinters in various coastal sites in central and southern <br /> California, and central populations overwinter in Mexico. Monarchs have multiple generations <br /> during their migrations; the second, third and fourth generations return to their northern <br /> locations in the United States and Canada in the spring. <br /> The project area contains migratory and overwintering habitat for the monarch butterfly. <br /> Showy milkweed (Asclepias speciosa) is an abundant component of the vegetation in the <br /> transitional zones along the boundaries of the wetland areas. Adult butterflies and several <br /> monarch caterpillars were observed feeding on milkweeds at the western edge of the property. <br /> Western Colorado is not part of a major monarch migration corridor, but the site is being used <br /> by migrating adults and as a potential overwintering site for the dispersed population in the <br /> area. <br /> Proposed development would occur primarily outside the mesic/wetland meadows where the <br /> majority of milkweed is located, therefore direct impacts to host plants and habitats would be <br /> largely avoided.The project would result in the complete loss of vegetation from approximately <br /> 20 acres of the property, which would result in potential direct impacts to chrysalis and <br /> caterpillars and reduce the foraging vegetation available to adult butterflies. This may result <br /> in minor, localized impacts to migrating monarch butterflies, and may reduce the <br /> attractiveness of the site as an egg-laying site. <br /> Development of the parcel is not likely to jeopardize this Candidate species, as the project <br /> may affect individuals but is not expected to alter the species' overall range and life history <br /> patterns. USFWS consultation is not required by ESA for Candidate species where an action <br /> is not likely to jeopardize the species' existence. <br /> Ute Ladies'-Tresses -Threatened. The project area occurs outside the known range of the <br /> Ute ladies'-tresses orchid and is a significant distance from the nearest known populations in <br /> the Roaring Fork Valley. The parcel does contain wet meadow conditions that are potentially <br /> 2-13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.