Laserfiche WebLink
F;C S,,ntt - Ftfle 'G'ravel P 1, #1 IV�AV 2(1Li <br /> Section 4.203.E of the LUDC outlines the Landscaping Plan requirements. This section of the <br /> LUDC also mentions that industrial uses are exempt from landscaping standards. The Project <br /> constitutes an industrial use; therefore, a reclamation and revegetation plan has been <br /> developed for the site in lieu of landscaping. Please refer to Section 2.12.7 <br /> Revegetation/Reclamation regarding post-mining reclamation plans, and to Figure 6 for <br /> schematic details. <br /> 2.5 Impact Analysis <br /> Section 4-203.G of the LUDC outlines the Impact Analysis requirements. This can be found <br /> in Appendix G. <br /> 2.6 Development Agreement/ Improvements <br /> Section 4-203.J and 4-203.K of the LUDC outline the Development Agreement / <br /> Improvements Agreement requirements. Scott believes there are no vesting issues and <br /> identified improvements to the North Frontage Road have been permitting and will commence <br /> upon approval of this permit application. <br /> 2.7 Basic Traffic Study <br /> Section 4-2031 of the LUDC outlines the Traffic Study— Basic Traffic Study requirements. A <br /> copy of the CDOT-approved Traffic Impact Study is included Appendix B. The 1-70 N <br /> Frontage Road (also known as CR 346)will be used to access the site(Figure 1). The County <br /> Road and Bridge staff confirmed that any increased traffic along this road is to be addressed <br /> using the CDOT process. CDOT has approved the traffic impacts of this project as part of <br /> their review and issuance of an Access Permit for the Project. <br /> 2.8 Water Supply/ Distribution Plan <br /> Scott is requesting a waiver from this standard. <br /> The Garfield County Public Health Department, Mr. Edward R. "Ted" White, (in a letter dated <br /> August 27, 2020, to Mr. Patrick Waller) communicated the following specific to the Potable <br /> Water waiver(see letter in Appendix D): <br /> "The location of the proposed project does not facilitate water service from either the <br /> Town of Silt or the City of Rifle.Additionally,the nature of development and dewatering <br /> of the gravel pit does not facilitate the drilling of a well for potable water use. The <br /> applicant proposes to purchase water for on-site use from a bulk water seller and haul <br /> to the site for storage and use. We believe that this proposed variance is acceptable, <br /> provided that adequate hand washing facilities, in addition to the mentioned water <br /> bottle filling are provided to employees during the proposed 12-hour days of operation. <br /> We would recommend that annual testing of the water in the storage facility on-site <br /> occur to ensure that water quality is maintained throughout the project. Additionally, <br /> we would recommend maintaining invoices from the bulk water purchases on-site in <br /> case an employee develops a water-borne illness, to allow for tracking of the potential <br /> water source. Garfield County Public Health supports this variance request from the <br /> Water Supply and Distribution standard, provided that hand washing stations are <br /> provided, and water quality is tracked." <br /> 2-2 <br />