My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-01-04_PERMIT FILE - M2022013 (25)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2022013
>
2023-01-04_PERMIT FILE - M2022013 (25)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2023 8:52:37 PM
Creation date
1/4/2023 8:18:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2022013
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/4/2023
Doc Name Note
Response on Wildlife Impacts
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
Raptor Materials, LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
RDZ
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Denver 1842 North Clarkson Street, Denver, CO 80218 <br /> Durango 835 East Second Avenue, Suite 400, Durango, CO 81301 <br /> ERQ Hotchkiss 161 South 2nd Street, PO Box 932, Hotchkiss, CO 81419 <br /> ERO Resources Corporation Idaho 7154 West State Street, Suite 398, Boise, ID 83714 <br /> November 30, 2022 <br /> Brad Janes, Forester <br /> Raptor Materials <br /> 8120 Gage St. <br /> Erie, CO. 80516 <br /> RE: Two Rivers OMLR Comment <br /> Dear Mr.Janes, <br /> Response for Wildlife Impacts: <br /> My understanding is that mining is dependent on the aggregate market and the law of supply and <br /> demand. Both the timing (schedule) and amount of extraction will depend on the demand for materials <br /> and any single point in time. The mine must have maximum flexibility to mine to be able to respond to <br /> the market forces that are outside of their control. Maximum flexibility under the mine plan would <br /> allow for up to "four separate extraction teams" working concurrently. Under this "worse-case" <br /> scenario and adhering to the maximum of 16 acres of mining by each extraction team would result in a <br /> maximum of 64 acres being extracted at any one time. To put this into context,the majority of the <br /> extraction operations and soil stockpiling will be conducted in on the approximately 235 acres currently <br /> under high intensity farming. Extraction on 64 acres would only be a little over one-quarter of the <br /> agricultural land. Expanding this concept to include the riparian corridors within and immediately <br /> adjacent to the extraction area,there is over 1,000 acres between CR 378 (54th Street Road) and CR <br /> 394. A maximum of 64 acres being actively extracted would amount to only 6.4 percent of the 1,000 <br /> acres, leaving more than 93 percent of the area available to wildlife. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Ronald Beane <br /> Senior Wildlife Biologist <br /> ERO Resources Corporation I Consultants in Natural Resources and the Environment www.eroresources.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.