Laserfiche WebLink
Division Second Adequacy Comment <br /> As noted at the beginning of this letter, RM needs to revise actual evhibits (in this <br /> case Evhibit D to address adequacy items and re-submit them. Also, please <br /> address the particular structures (above ground and underground) and easements <br /> shown on Map C-1. <br /> Raptor Materials Second Adequacy Response <br /> As requested, Exhibits C-1 and C-2 have been enhanced and an updated table <br /> added to Exhibit C-1. Further the matter is addressed in revised Exhibit D (p7, <br /> Footnote 1). <br /> 19) On page 7, more detail is needed for the roads onsite. Please explain which <br /> roads will be built and which will be modified. Explain construction method and <br /> dimensions. <br /> Raptor Materials First Adequacy Response <br /> All lands within the Extraction Limits will be traversed during extraction and are <br /> not roads. Areas outside of Active Extraction that have existing agricultural access <br /> roads below the existing riverside berms, may be accessed by all manner of <br /> vehicles and equipment and may be modified accordingly. <br /> In this instance, these are not leased lands but Owner Operator lands. As such, any <br /> improvement of existing access roads, or creation of new access roads, are capital <br /> improvements of the land. Therefore, all improvements to access are an asset to <br /> the landowner, and as such, will not be removed by a default by the operator, but <br /> retained subsequent to extraction where they are not otherwise removed by the <br /> same. This is established real property law. <br /> As to design widths and composition, this will be field fit and determined, and <br /> updated in required OMLR Annual Reports. Road widths will vary but may typically <br /> be 10 to 40 feet wide depending on end use. Road surfaces will be fit for purpose <br /> and constructed using site produced materials if necessary to improve or establish <br /> the running surface. <br /> Division Second Adequacy Comment <br /> No additional response is required from R117 <br /> 211Page <br /> Correspondence to the Colorado Office of Mined Land Reclamation—Reply to Rob Zuber,EPS—Adequacy Letters of 24 June and 5 <br /> August 2022;in the matter of the Two Rivers Sand,Gravel and Reservoir Project—M2022-013. <br />