Laserfiche WebLink
- <br /> ✓ <br /> t 4 I <br /> 511 <br /> �20,EASEMENT <br /> �/. <br /> �8 ( Fr erx�n. s? <br /> 68 - <br /> EWVDAR (SEE N07E 6) J ' <br /> -15 <br /> No za+.410ens <br /> Division Second Adequacy Comment <br /> ATo additional response is required from RM. <br /> 13) For the sake of clarity, the Division recommends that the entire permit area be <br /> permitted to be affected, and this should be stated in Exhibit C and Exhibit D. (The <br /> Division recognizes that this statement is made in Exhibit W <br /> Raptor Materials First Adequacy Response <br /> Your language is accurate, for it provides more precisely that all lands within the <br /> permit boundary may become `affected lands.' Regardless, this statement is <br /> included in the Original Submittal Exhibit D, Pages 5 and 8= <br /> 131Page <br /> Correspondence to the Colorado Office of Mined Land Reclamation—Reply to Rob Zuber,EPS—Adequacy Letters of 24 June and 5 <br /> August 2022; in the matter of the Two Rivers Sand,Gravel and Reservoir Project—M2022-013. <br />