My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-12-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2022-12-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2022 1:58:51 PM
Creation date
12/20/2022 10:30:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/19/2022
Doc Name Note
Section 7 Consultation.
Doc Name
Correspondence
From
Clayton Creed
To
DRMS
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
It is possible that the mercury concentrations measured in Colorado pikeminnow might result in <br /> a minor reduction of vigor through reduced mental and physical reaction times, which would <br /> impact their ability to escape predation from northern pike, smallmouth bass, or other <br /> piscivorous predators. Reduced swimming ability could also lead to a reduction in feeding <br /> success (i.e., capturing other fish to eat). However,the nonnative competitors and predators in <br /> the action area, such as northern pike and smallmouth bass, are experiencing the same water <br /> mercury concentrations and therefore may not have a significant competitive advantage or <br /> increased predation success over Colorado pikeminnow in the presence of elevated mercury. <br /> There is also evidence,however,that different predaceous fish species bioaccumulate mercury at <br /> different rates even within the same river segment due, in part,to differences in fish physiology <br /> and diet(CDPHE 2015, MacRury et al. 2002, EPA 2004). In fact, CDPHE (2015) found average <br /> mercury levels in Colorado pikeminnow adults were more than twice as high as northern pike <br /> adults in the Yampa River, although the sample size was small and different river segments were <br /> sampled for each species (CDPHE 2015). <br /> Despite the uncertainties outlined above,we can come to basic conclusions regarding the effect <br /> to endangered fish from the mining of coal and its eventual combustion. Given fish tissue <br /> mercury concentrations have been determined to be elevated in Colorado pikeminnow from both <br /> the Yampa and White Rivers,but in particular in the White River, and coal mining and local <br /> combustion adds mercury to the system,this additional mercury adds to any negative effects <br /> resulting from mercury exposure. Based on the best available science, we believe some <br /> Colorado pikeminnow individuals are experiencing low, chronic negative health effects from <br /> mercury already in the action area. The mercury added by this project will add to the effects of <br /> this chronic condition, although the relative contribution of project-related mercury is assumed to <br /> be a very small percentage of the total mercury that has been and will continue to be deposited in <br /> the action area, as explained above. <br /> Additionally, as stated in the Baseline section above,mercury concentration measurements have <br /> been higher in Colorado pikeminnow taken from the White River than from the Yampa River <br /> despite the fact that there are two coal-fired power plants (the Craig and Hayden Stations) <br /> located along the Yampa River and none within the White River watershed. This adds evidence <br /> to the assumption that local coal combustion from these power plants does not appear to <br /> constitute the primary source of mercury contamination in these watersheds. <br /> Despite the chronic, low-level harmful effects of mercury that Colorado pikeminnow are likely <br /> experiencing,we believe the population decline seen in Colorado pikeminnow populations <br /> within the Yampa and White Rivers over the past decade or more is primarily a result of <br /> increased nonnative species in these rivers, especially northern pike and smallmouth bass. As <br /> explained in the baseline section above,these nonnative fish populations have increased and <br /> have applied increasing pressure on the Colorado pikeminnow population. Coal emissions from <br /> the Craig and Hayden Stations have been largely constant since they became fully operational in <br /> the 1970s. The more recent decline of Colorado pikeminnow numbers in the action area <br /> coincides more closely with the expansion of nonnative fish, rather than any increase in mercury <br /> in the action area. <br /> 52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.