My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-12-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2022-12-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2022 1:58:51 PM
Creation date
12/20/2022 10:30:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/19/2022
Doc Name Note
Section 7 Consultation.
Doc Name
Correspondence
From
Clayton Creed
To
DRMS
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Generating Station as a result of the combustion of Trapper Mine coal over the next 9.4 years <br /> (3.73 kg x 9.4= 35.06 kg). <br /> No current data or modeling are available to indicate how much of the mercury that is emitted by <br /> either the Craig Station or the Hayden Station is deposited annually within the airshed used in <br /> this assessment. However, a recent contaminant modeling effort conducted for the Four Corners <br /> Power Plant and Navajo Mine Energy Project(FCPP&NMEP) (EPRI 2014)included detailed <br /> modeling of the emissions and deposition of mercury produced at the Four Corners Power Plant. <br /> In those models, it was determined that approximately 95 percent of all mercury emitted by the <br /> Four Corners Power Plant rises high enough into the atmosphere to be carried by prevailing wind <br /> currents and out of the local area analyzed in that effort. Although environmental conditions at <br /> the Craig Generating Station may be somewhat different, and our analysis here involves a much <br /> smaller amount of coal to be combusted, that modeling effort provides a roughly comparable <br /> situation that will assist us with our analysis. <br /> Assuming a five percent local mercury deposition rate, 0.187 kg of mercury would be deposited <br /> in the local action area each year from the combustion of the proposed Trapper Mine coal at the <br /> Craig Generating Station (3.73 kg x 0.05). Over the proposed life of the project(9.4 years), this <br /> would equate to 1.76 kg of locally-deposited mercury (0.187 kg x 9.4). <br /> An alternative method of estimating the amount of mercury that would be deposited from the <br /> proposed project can be derived from an examination of a local mercury deposition monitoring <br /> site. A Mercury Deposition Network(MDN)monitoring site is located in Routt County just east <br /> of Steamboat Springs on Buffalo Pass. It is at the eastern edge of the airshed analyzed for this <br /> project(see map in BA). These monitoring stations measure the levels of mercury that are <br /> deposited during precipitation events (i.e. wet deposition). The Buffalo Pass site is the nearest <br /> MDN receptor to the action area. The Craig Generating Station is approximately 45 miles west <br /> of the Buffalo Pass MDN site. This site has provided data on the wet deposition of mercury to <br /> the MDN since 2007. Data from this station in 2013 indicated that there was an annual <br /> deposition of 9.757 µg/m2 of mercury at that location (NAPD 2015). <br /> Using the results of the emission and deposition modeling conducted at FCPP as a possible <br /> scenario, and assuming that the average annual deposition of 9.757 µg/m2 of mercury is equally <br /> distributed throughout the Yampa and White River watersheds (a combined total of 34,362 <br /> km2); an annual deposition of 335.27 kg of mercury is calculated. The entirety of the Colorado <br /> River Fish Action Area is within these two watersheds and is 10,514 km2 (BA, Figure 6). <br /> Therefore, assuming an even distribution of mercury deposition,there would be a total of 102.59 <br /> kg of mercury deposited annually over the entire Action Area. However, if the results of the <br /> FCPP &NMEP model are used,then only five percent of the mercury deposited would be <br /> emitted from local sources and the other 95 percent would come from global or other distant <br /> sources. If we assume that all local mercury deposition is from the two coal-fired power plants <br /> (likely an overestimate), this would indicate that the proportional amount of mercury deposited <br /> annually that comes from the two local generating stations is 5.13 kg (5 percent from local <br /> sources) across the entire Action Area (102.59 kg x 0.05). <br /> The proportion of local mercury attributable to the Craig Generating can be estimated by <br /> comparing the ratio of coal that is combusted amongst the two generating stations. According to <br /> 46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.