My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-12-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2022-12-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2022 1:58:51 PM
Creation date
12/20/2022 10:30:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/19/2022
Doc Name Note
Section 7 Consultation.
Doc Name
Correspondence
From
Clayton Creed
To
DRMS
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.3.4 Threats <br /> The humpback chub was designated as an endangered species prior to enactment of the ESA, and <br /> therefore a formal listing package identifying threats was not assembled. Construction and <br /> operation of mainstem dams,nonnative fish species, and local eradication of native minnows and <br /> suckers in advance of new human-made reservoirs in the early 1960's were recognized as early <br /> threats (Service 2002c). According to the 2002 Recovery Goals for the species,the primary <br /> threats to humpback chub are streamflow regulation, habitat modification, predation by <br /> non-native fish species,parasitism, hybridization with other native Gila species, and pesticides <br /> and pollutants (Service 2002c). No new threats have emerged since the completion of this <br /> document. The Service's status review of humpback chub completed in 2011 (Service 201 lb) <br /> reported that 60 percent of the recovery factor criteria(Service 2002c)have been addressed to <br /> varying degrees; however,nonnative fish species and issues dealing with the potential chemical <br /> contamination of the river from spills and pipelines continue to be problematic. Overall, the <br /> threats to the humpback chub from nonnative fish are similar to those facing the Colorado <br /> pikeminnow, as described above. See the discussion on threats to the Colorado pikeminnow <br /> above for further information, particularly regarding the threat to all endangered fish due to <br /> predation from nonnative species. <br /> To summarize, humpback chub habitat loss and degradation from dams and diversions <br /> constructed decades ago posed some of the early, primary impacts to the species. Most of the <br /> long-term impacts from these structures continue and are unlikely to change significantly in the <br /> near term. In the remaining suitable habitats, nonnative fish species pose a significant ongoing <br /> threat and challenge to recovery. Contaminants, including mercury and selenium, may pose a <br /> lesser threat as well, but the magnitude of this threat is in need of further investigation. <br /> 2.4 Bonytail <br /> 2.4.1 Species description <br /> The bonytail is a medium-sized freshwater fish in the minnow family, endemic to the Colorado <br /> River Basin. The species evolved around 3 to 5 million years ago (Sigler and Sigler 1996). <br /> Individuals have large fins and a streamlined body that typically is very thin in front of the tail. <br /> They have a gray or olive colored back, silver sides, and a white belly (Sigler and Sigler 1996). <br /> The mouth is slightly overhung by the snout and there is a smooth low hump behind the head <br /> that is not as pronounced as the hump on a humpback chub. A very close relative to the <br /> roundtail chub (Gila robusta), bonytail can be distinguished by counting the number of rays in <br /> the fins,with bonytail having 10 dorsal and anal fin rays (Sigler and Sigler 1996). The fish can <br /> grow to be 600 mm (24 in.) and are thought to live as long as 20 to 50 years (Sigler and Sigler <br /> 1996). Little is known about the specific food and habitat of the bonytail because the species <br /> was extirpated from most of its historic range prior to extensive fishery surveys,but it is <br /> considered adapted to mainstem rivers, residing in pools and eddies,while eating terrestrial and <br /> aquatic insects (Service 2002d). <br /> Bonytail were once widespread in the large rivers of the Colorado River Basin (Service 2002a). <br /> The species experienced a dramatic, but poorly documented, decline starting in about 1950, <br /> 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.