My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-12-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2022-12-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2022 1:58:51 PM
Creation date
12/20/2022 10:30:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/19/2022
Doc Name Note
Section 7 Consultation.
Doc Name
Correspondence
From
Clayton Creed
To
DRMS
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.2.3 Population dynamics <br /> Population estimates during the 1980 to 1992 period were on average between 300 and 600 wild <br /> fish (Modde et al. 1996). By the early 2000s, the wild population consisted of primarily aging <br /> adults,with steep decline in numbers caused by extremely low natural recruitment(Service <br /> 2002b). Although reproduction was occurring,very few juveniles were found (Service 2002b). <br /> In the early part of the 2000s, population numbers were extremely low. Population estimates <br /> from sampling efforts in the Middle Green River had declined to approximately 100 by 2002, <br /> with researchers hypothesizing that wild fish in the Green River Basin could become extirpated <br /> because of lack of recruitment(Bestgen et al. 2002). Similarly, in the upper Colorado River, <br /> razorback sucker were exceedingly rare. In the 2002 recovery plan, razorback sucker were <br /> considered extirpated in the Gunnison River,where fish were last captured in 1976 (Service <br /> 2002b). Similarly, in the Grand Valley, only 12 fish were collected from 1984 to 1990, despite <br /> intensive sampling (Service 2002b). No young razorback sucker were captured in the Upper <br /> Colorado River since the mid-1960s (Service 2002b). <br /> Razorback sucker likely occurred in the San Juan River as far upstream as Rosa,New Mexico <br /> (now inundated by Navajo Reservoir) (Ryden 1997). In the San Juan River we know of only two <br /> wild razorback suckers that were captured in 1976 in a riverside pond near Bluff,Utah, and one <br /> fish captured in the river in 1988, also near Bluff(Ryden 2006). No wild razorback sucker were <br /> found during the 7-year research period (1991-1997) of the San Juan River Basin Recovery <br /> Implementation Program (Ryden 2006). <br /> Because of the low numbers of wild fish, the Recovery Program has been rebuilding razorback <br /> sucker populations in the upper Colorado River Basin with hatchery stocks. Since 1995, over <br /> 375,000 subadult razorback suckers have been stocked in the Green and upper Colorado River <br /> subbasins. Preliminary population estimates were generated for razorback sucker in the <br /> Colorado River as a whole (from Palisade, CO downstream to its confluence with the Green <br /> River), for adult fish> 400 mm TL (Figure 6). Although razorback sucker numbers have begun <br /> increasing in the past decade in the Green River subbasin due to stocking efforts,no standardized <br /> monitoring program to produce a population estimate has begun for the Green River subbasin <br /> (Service 2012a). <br /> 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.