My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-10-26_PERMIT FILE - C1981041
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981041
>
2022-10-26_PERMIT FILE - C1981041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2022 9:05:21 AM
Creation date
12/13/2022 9:01:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/26/2022
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 10 Vegetation Information
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 4.0 SUMMARY <br />A quantitative vegetation study was conducted in July 1982 at the Roadside <br />and Cameo No. 1 Mines, Mesa County, Colorado. The study was designed in <br />accordance with the "Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br />Division, 1980" to establish a standard for measuring revegetation success. <br />Powderhorn Coal personnel and Colorado Mined Land Reclamation specialists <br />determined that data from these study areas would be appropriate for <br />establishing reclamation success standards. <br />This study quantitatively determined the vegetation cover, production, <br />density, and shrub heights for each of the three study areas and mapped <br />the entire permit area and some adjacent areas. Tables 15, 16, and 17, <br />respectively, summarize the cover, production, and shrub density and height <br />data. <br />All three study areas have high densities and sometimes extensive cover <br />of native shrubs. <br />The vegetation cover of the study area varies from a low of 34.8 percent <br />for Shadscale Shrubland to a high of 50.9 percent for Greasewood Shrubland. <br />Greasewood/Shadscale Grassland had a cover of 44.2. Litter and soil <br />cover are relatively high in all study areas while rock cover is high in <br />the Shadscale and Greasewood/Shadscale sites. <br />• The vegetation composition of these study areas has been greatly affected <br />by past disturbance, mc•st likely prolonged and intensive grazing by live- <br />stock. This has resulted in a'decrease in the cover of native grasses <br />and forbs. Today, introduced and native annual grasses and forbs account <br />for a significant portion of the herbaceous cover in all study areas. <br />Prohibited and restricted noxious weeds are frequent and there are no <br />threatened or endangered plant species. <br />Table 16 summarizes the production for the three study areas. Greasewood <br />Shrubland is the most productive at 466.2 Ibs/ac. The production in <br />Greasewood/Shadscale Grassland is very low at 142.0 Ibs/ac. Shadscale <br />Shrubland is also quite low at 164.4 Ibs/ac. As with cover, most of the <br />production comes from annual and perennial weedy species and annual grasses <br />all of which tend to be unpalatable to livestock. <br />The shrub density ranged from a low of 1635 for Shadscale Shrubland to <br />a high of 2315 for Greasewood Shrubland. Greasewood/Shadscale Grassland <br />was intermediate in density at 2040. All these study areas have probably <br />increased shrub densities today due to a selective advantage resulting <br />from overgrazing as livestock tend to graze on the herbaceous component <br />rather than the shrubs. Shrub heights were varied per study area but <br />tended to be higher in the Greasewood Shrubland and lowest in the Grease- <br />wood/Shadscale Grassland. <br />• Either statistical adequacy or the maximum number of samples was taken for <br />cover, production, and density. <br />-13- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.