Laserfiche WebLink
• Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology expressed concerns that the original reference <br />area did not represent the greasewood shrubland vegetation community that had been <br />disturbed at the mine or the greasewood community that would be reestablished during <br />reclamation efforts. Further, the area that encompasses the original greasewood reference <br />area had a history of human disturbance. The new greasewood reference area was <br />selected to address these concerns. A comparison of the two reference areas is in order to <br />evaluate their characteristics in light of the concerns that Jed to the selection and sampling <br />of the new greasewood reference azea. These comparisons are not intended as a <br />quantitative evaluation of the compazability of the two reference areas, but as a general <br />indicator of the nature of the two communities, with similarities and differences identified. <br />Vegetation Cover <br />In 1983, the total vegetation cover of the original greasewood reference area was 50.9 <br />percent. Three lifeforms were represented in the cover sampling. Graminoids accounted <br />for 7.7 percent total cover, forbs 17.8 percent, and shrubs 24.9 percent. Non-vegetation <br />cover accounted for 49.1 percent. A small cryptogamic component was present (0.6%). <br />The dominant individual species was Sarcobatus vermiculatus with ] 9.5 percent mean <br />cover, followed by Sueda fruticosa, a perennial forb (12.6% mean cover), Distichlis <br />spicata (5.6%), Chrysothamnus nauseosus (5.2%), Lepidium perfoliatum (3.3%), and <br />Bromus lectorum with 2.0 percent mean cover. <br />• This year, the new greasewood reference area revealed total vegetation cover of 49.07 <br />percent. Four lifefomLS were present in the cover sampling. Of those, graminoids <br />accounted for 35.47 percent total cover, forbs 0.93 percent, succulents 0.13 percent, and <br />woody plants 12.53 percent total cover. Litter, bare ground and rock provided 42.27 <br />percent cover. A significant cryptogamic crust was present and accounted for 8.67 <br />percent cover. The dominant species was Bromus tectorum, accounting for 28.93 percent <br />total cover. Sarcobatus vermiculatus provided the second highest cover at 8.13 percent. <br />Hilaria jamesii and Gutierrezia sarothrae also provided significant cover of 4,67 and 2.27 <br />percent, respectively. <br />By overall comparison the two reference areas contain the same amount of vegetative <br />cover. Dominant species differ in the two areas, likely attributable to physical and historic <br />factors, including slope, aspect, moisture regime, parent material, and human <br />manipulation. The dominance of Sarcobatus vermiculatus in the original reference area <br />reveals a more mesic moisture regime and higher cation concentrations in the soils of the <br />area. The new greasewood reference area is situated higher elevationally, with significant <br />moisture being provided by precipitation and occasional overflow of the ephemeral <br />drainage. The dominance of Bromus tectorum in the new greasewood reference area is <br />also indicative of the more xeric moisture regime as well as the more open character of the <br />community, which provides niche space for the opportunistic Bromus. <br />• The original greasewood reference area cover sampling encountered one annual grass <br />(Bromus tectorum) and two perennial grass species (Distichlis spicata and a trace of Poa <br />-~- <br />