Laserfiche WebLink
This email has been received from outside of DOI-Use caution before clicking on links,opening attachments,or responding. <br /> Hi Amber, <br /> Since sections 11 and 12 are outside the Forest Boundary,the waterline does not intersect National Forest. <br /> Section 2 is more difficult to determine. <br /> Without an accurate map or survey showing the location of the waterline compared to National Forest System land, I am <br /> unable to determine if the waterline intersects National Forest. <br /> I suspect, if the waterline does intersect National Forest, it is very small. In that case, I would try to move the waterline <br /> off National Forest. <br /> Thanks, Mike <br /> Mike Johnson <br /> 94 Lands and Minerals Staff <br /> Forest Service <br /> Boulder Ranger District <br /> c: 970-S31-9609 <br /> michael.johnson6@usda.gov <br /> 2140 Yarmouth <br /> Boulder, CO 80301 <br /> www.fs.fed.us <br /> =V ln <br /> Caring for the land and serving people <br /> From: Pike,Amber M <apike@blm.gov> <br /> Sent:Wednesday, May 25, 2022 2:32 PM <br /> To:Johnson, Mike- FS<Michael.Johnson6@usda.gov> <br /> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re:Surface Ownership T01N R72W Sec 02, 11& 12-Water Pipeline Proposal <br /> Mike, <br /> Unfortunately, no. <br /> I asked Ben for this information and he said the maps attached to the original plan depicts the surface <br /> ownership; however, I'm only seeing where the patented claims are located. Maybe I'm over looking <br /> something. I've attached the original Plan for your review. <br /> I'll also email Ben and see if he has a kmz or map of the land survey. The BLM records show no intersection <br /> with USFS lands, so I can't verify Ben's info with ours. I'm assuming y'all have the same info as BLM? <br /> 6 <br />