Laserfiche WebLink
decreased pumping rates or their wells going dry. This is not anticipated because the modeled saturated thickness of <br /> the alluvial deposit is still eighteen (18)to twenty(20)feet at full buildout of both sites. <br /> The groundwater table to the south of the Site and underlying the Town of Gilcrest is anticipated to rise as a result of the <br /> full buildout of the slurry walls at the Site and the Monarch DENM Site. Mitigation for mounding is warranted at the <br /> southern end of the Site. The mounding is expected to be greatest towards the southwest comer of the Site and <br /> decreases to the east at full buildout. Mounding of more than two(2)feet at the south site perimeter, monitoring wells <br /> MW-5 and MW-6,coincides with an approximate one(1)foot rise in town. To mitigate against possible groundwater <br /> elevation rise in town, a two(2)foot cut off was used to implement mitigation at the south site boundary. <br /> Mitigation was modelled in two(2)phases coinciding with the construction schedule of the Site and the Monarch DENM <br /> slurry walls.The first phase is an underdrain or series of dewatering wells along the eastern half of the site parallel to <br /> Weld County Road 42. The second phase is the construction of an underdrain between Cell 6 and the Western Mutual <br /> Ditch west of where the ditch crosses on to the property to approximately 200 feet east of Highway 60. <br /> 6.3.1 Phase 1 Mitigation <br /> Mounding at the southern end of the Site boundary and in Town is not expected to rise more than two(2)feet before the <br /> construction of the Cell 4 slurry wall so mitigation is not warranted until the Cell 4 slurry wall is constructed or Site <br /> monitoring observes a higher than anticipated groundwater elevation at the southern monitoring wells(MW-5 and MW-6). <br /> See Table 4 below and Figures 8 and 9. <br /> Table 4 <br /> Base Model and Modeled Site Groundwater Level After Cell 3 Slurry Wall <br /> Modeled Cell 3,4 and 5N <br /> Well Base Slurry Wall Difference Cell IJK <br /> MW-1 47269 4,726.4 -0.5 146,111,1 <br /> MW-2 4,7178 4,716.0 -1.8 136,119,1 <br /> MW-3 4,725.0 4,725.8 0.8 142136,1 <br /> MW-4 4,732.5 4,734.1 1.6 153136,1 <br /> MW-5 4,736.7 4,736.8 0.1 162133,1 <br /> MW-6 4,738.4 4,737.2 -1.2 162115,1 <br /> MW-7 4,729.1 4,7282 -0.9 148122,1 <br /> BBA-MW4 4,741.3 4,740.9 -0.4 148,122,2 <br /> BBA-MW11 4,737.1 4,737.5 0.4 148122,3 <br /> BBA-MW18 4,7386 4,7389 0.3 148,122,4 <br /> BBA-EC 4,732.5 4,732.9 0.4 148,122,5 <br /> A series of wells were modelled at the southeastern corner of the site after the addition of the Cell 4 slurry wall and the <br /> Monarch DENM Cell 1 slurry wall. These wells were set to pump 2.25 cubic feet per second(CFS)and removed the <br /> groundwater from the model simulating return flow back to the river.Table 5 below shows the groundwater head <br /> elevations at the monitoring well locations for this model iteration. <br /> Groundwater Model Report—Section 20 Gravel Mine Site -10- August 2022 <br />