My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-11-07_PERMIT FILE - M2022001 (11)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2022001
>
2022-11-07_PERMIT FILE - M2022001 (11)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2022 8:49:40 PM
Creation date
11/7/2022 1:46:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2022001
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/7/2022
Doc Name Note
Exhibit G - Water Information - Gilcrest Area Alluvial Groundwater Model
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Red Tierra Equities, LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Groundwater levels for monitoring wells in the Town of Gilcrest were also utilized in calibration of the model. The BBA <br /> report contained well readings from multiple wells in the Town of Gilcrest measured in 2014. It was assumed that these <br /> readings were similar to current head elevations and four(4)monitoring wells were included to get a representative <br /> sample of the Town. Of the four(4)wells chosen,three (3)of them were within 0.5 feet of observed. BBA-EC, northeast <br /> of town on the eastern side of Highway 85 was 1.5 feet lower than the observed elevation head. The monitoring wells <br /> included in the BBA report were recorded in 1 foot intervals,which could account for the 1.5 feet difference.Table 2 <br /> below has the comparison between the measured and modeled groundwater levels at the Site. The head contours for <br /> the baseline condition are shown on Figure 4. <br /> Table 2 <br /> Measured and Modeled Site Groundwater Levels <br /> Well Observed Modeled Difference Cell IJK <br /> MW-1 4,725.40 4727.1 1.70 146,111,1 <br /> MW-2 4,718.17 4717.9 -0.27 136,119,1 <br /> MW-3 4,725.07 4724.9 -0.17 142,136,1 <br /> MW-4 4,732.07 4732.5 1 0.43 153,136,1 <br /> MW-5 4,736.43 4736.7 0.27 162,133,1 <br /> MW-6 4,738.43 4737.7 -0.73 162,115,1 <br /> MW-7 4,728.92 4728.9 -0.02 148,122,1 <br /> BBA-MW4 4741 4740.3 -0.70 148,122,1 <br /> BBA-MW11 4737 4736.9 -0.10 148,122,1 <br /> BBA-MW17 4735 4734.4 -0.60 166,164,1 <br /> BBA-MW18 4738 4737.25 -0.75 148,122,1 <br /> DROU-MW-01 4741.5 4743.4 1.90 177,86,1 <br /> DROU-MW-02 4743 4744 1.00 176,94,1 <br /> DROU-MW-03 4747.1 4747.3 0.20 182,93,1 <br /> DROU-MW-04 4749.1 4750 0.90 187,93,1 <br /> DROU-MW-05 4746.6 4746.8 0.20 1 183,84,1 <br /> 6.2 Slurry Wall Installation Simulation <br /> The Site is planned for a sequence of soil bentonite slung wall lined cells encompassing the majority of the Site.The <br /> only area not planned to be slung wall lined is the siltation pond in the northwest corner of the Site and a potential <br /> recharge pond north of Cell 7.The slurry walls will be constructed in stages starting in the northeast and progressing <br /> south then west(see attached Mine Plan for phasing). In order to model for the worst-case scenario,the model includes <br /> a simulated slurry wall around the whole section, minus the Siltation Pond area. To make the Site a no flow area,the <br /> horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the Site was set to zero(0)feet/day.The area where the Western Mutual Ditch runs <br /> through the Site remained at the 805 feet/day horizontal hydraulic conductivity. <br /> The mounding and shadowing for the surrounding properties and wells is described in Table 3 below: <br /> Groundwater Model Report-Section 20 Gravel Mine Site -7- August 2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.